2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-12177-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Group Convolution in Lightweight Deep Networks for Object Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the layer sequence of our network is mainly inspired by the plain network of Resnet, no shortcut connections are used for our network which come up to the VGG architecture. The motivation for not using the shortcut connections comes from previous experiments which are detailed in this paper [3]. The authors demonstrate that the shortcut connections don't provide a significant improvement in accuracy in shallow networks, which is the case with our 9 layers encoder.…”
Section: Encoder Stage : V2n9slimmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, the layer sequence of our network is mainly inspired by the plain network of Resnet, no shortcut connections are used for our network which come up to the VGG architecture. The motivation for not using the shortcut connections comes from previous experiments which are detailed in this paper [3]. The authors demonstrate that the shortcut connections don't provide a significant improvement in accuracy in shallow networks, which is the case with our 9 layers encoder.…”
Section: Encoder Stage : V2n9slimmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The current work extends this concept by adding group convolution in all convolution layers (Net-2, Net-3, Net-4, SoildNet), also we experiment with dynamic group size (Net-4, SoildNet) to reduce the network complexity by more than two times in trainable parameters (Net-3 vs. Net-4). The network schemes do not contain residual connections because group convolution was found to be not very effective for the networks with low depth as presented in [15]. Also, a similar study on residual connection for lightweight networks [16] is the reason not to use them in any of the proposals.…”
Section: Group Convolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network schemes do not contain residual connections because group convolution was found to be not very effective for the networks with low depth as presented in [15]. Also, a similar study on residual connection for lightweight networks [16] is the reason not to use them in any of the proposals. While adding group convolution at all layers of the network brings another challenge of insufficient feature blending.…”
Section: Group Convolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%