2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-021-03012-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of historical CMIP6 model simulations and future projections of temperature and precipitation in Paraguay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lovino et al . (2021) evaluated the performance of 19 CMIP6 models to simulate climate features over Paraguay and concluded that the bias‐corrected MME has the highest skill scores and can accurately reproduce the spatial pattern and annual cycle of precipitation. Li et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lovino et al . (2021) evaluated the performance of 19 CMIP6 models to simulate climate features over Paraguay and concluded that the bias‐corrected MME has the highest skill scores and can accurately reproduce the spatial pattern and annual cycle of precipitation. Li et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before assessing projections into the future, it is essential to evaluate the credibility of CMIP6 simulations with respect to observations on regional scales. Recent studies have already investigated the performance of CMIP6 in simulating regional historical climate and achieved positive results (Fan et al 2020b;Grose et al 2020;Li et al 2021;Lovino et al 2021;Srivastava et al 2020). However, a comprehensive assessment relative to historical observations over the PTP region has not yet been performed, especially for looking at the climate extremes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5) are now known as the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP4-6.0, and SSP5-8.5) [12,17]. We refer readers to the following literature for more details on: CMIP-1 [13,18,19]; CMIP-2 [14,16], CMIP-3 [18][19][20][21], CMIP5 [20,[22][23][24], and CMIP6 [25][26][27][28]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even now, with CMIP6, there is sufficient evidence to suggest the occurrence of a simulated mean warming climate due to a rising T [12,[19][20][21]24,27,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. A warming climate certainly impacts P distribution, which influences ET in both space and time [10,27,28]. Moreover, this comes as a natural question in the study of projections of future changes in ET seasonality vis-a-vis recent evidence of significant changes in P and T in some parts of the world [22,25,27,[30][31][32]37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%