2021
DOI: 10.32604/sv.2021.09114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Individual and Environmental Sound Pressure Level and Drawing Noise-Isosonic Maps using Surfer V.14 and Noise at Work V.5.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, it can be said that the acceptable inconsistency rate of a matrix or a system depends on the decisionmaker. However, Saaty presents 0.2 as the acceptable rate of inconsistency and believes that if the rate of inconsistency is higher than 0.1, it must be reviewed [41].…”
Section: Calculation Of the Rate Of Inconsistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, it can be said that the acceptable inconsistency rate of a matrix or a system depends on the decisionmaker. However, Saaty presents 0.2 as the acceptable rate of inconsistency and believes that if the rate of inconsistency is higher than 0.1, it must be reviewed [41].…”
Section: Calculation Of the Rate Of Inconsistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings were in compliance with the findings of the present study as the majority of the evaluated stations in this research were in the danger zone, and the mean SPL was between 84 and 90 dBA (except for two stations), and regulators were the main cause of the noise. Furthermore, Zare et al [41] did a study that aimed to evaluate the individual and environmental SPL and to draw noise maps using the Surfer and noise at work software in a glue production factory. They concluded that the canning unit accounted for the maximum SPL (92 dBA).…”
Section: Normalized Rank and Weight Of Each Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%