2023
DOI: 10.3390/children10030414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Individuals with Non-Syndromic Global Developmental Delay and Intellectual Disability

Abstract: Global Developmental Delay (GDD) and Intellectual Disability (ID) are two of the most common presentations encountered by physicians taking care of children. GDD/ID is classified into non-syndromic GDD/ID, where GDD/ID is the sole evident clinical feature, or syndromic GDD/ID, where there are additional clinical features or co-morbidities present. Careful evaluation of children with GDD and ID, starting with detailed history followed by a thorough examination, remain the cornerstone for etiologic diagnosis. Ho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, more comprehensive testing for specific diseases is typically justified once the results become available. 2,7,10,12,17)…”
Section: A C C E P T E D a R T I C L Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, more comprehensive testing for specific diseases is typically justified once the results become available. 2,7,10,12,17)…”
Section: A C C E P T E D a R T I C L Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic etiologies, including chromosomal abnormalities (e.g., microdeletions, microduplications, and trisomies), have been proposed to account for approximately half of GDD/ID cases. 2,10) Copy number variations, genetic deletions and duplications, and encompassing insertions are important contributors to human genetic diversity and sources of associated genetic mutations. The enhanced sensitivity of microarray-based genomic copy number analysis enables the detection of submicroscopic deletions and duplications, resulting in a significantly higher diagnostic yield than that of karyotyping (15% versus 7.4%, respectively).…”
Section: ) Chromosome Microarray Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A specific diagnosis provides social support and information sharing for the family and the physician. 2 The diagnostic evaluation should include detailed patient history and physical examination, standard karyotyping, fragile X molecular analysis, neurological imaging, and/or array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) studies with subtelomeric fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). With the aCGH method, an increase of 10% in diagnostic rate in cases with intellectual disability has been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%