Evaluation of industrial production policy in Russia

Bryukhovetskaya, S. V.; Sadriddinov, M. I.; Строев, П. В.; Gibadullin, A. A.; Kirpicheva, M. A.; Romanova, Ju A.

doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1515/3/032013

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…-establishment of the exact full replacement cost of construction (PVS) of buildings on the estimated site (there is no information about the design features of the facilities); -determination of the exact value of physical and economic wear and tear [20][21][22].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The assessment features of the third type permitted use land plots

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article deals with the problem of assessing agricultural land used for the placement of objects (buildings, structures, structures) used for the production, storage and primary processing of agricultural products. The problem is that the owner who has provided (sold) a land plot for an object can rightly claim a part of the future profit that arises from the synergistic effect of adding two assets - land and improvements. The work purpose is to formulate a methodology for assessing agricultural land located under buildings, taking into account the synergistic effect and their properties. In the course of the study, two approaches were considered for determining the entrepreneur's profit for the evaluated objects: first, on the basis of the economic results of the agricultural enterprises activities; secondly, on the basis of the invested funds alternative investment possibility. It was revealed that the owner of the land that will be built up, as a co-investor of the project, has the right to add to the value of the land in the amount of the rate of return on invested capital - 26.28%. The market (in this case, the cadastral) value of the surrounding land can be obtained from the results of the assessment of lands of the first type of use (arable land, pastures, hayfields).

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The assessment features of the third type permitted use land plots

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…If in crop production the self-sufficiency of the region is more than 100%, in animal husbandry it is about 50%. Therefore, the role of stimulating measures on the part of the state is increasing [5][6][7][8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Economic mechanism of the region breeding service activity

Titorenko

Zhichkin

2021

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article examines the concept and elements of the economic mechanism of breeding in the region. The main goal of this work is to determine the features of the economic mechanism of the breeding service in the region for its further optimization. At the same time, the following tasks are being solved: - to reveal the features of the economic mechanism of the breeding service of the region; - to determine the main factors influencing the activities of the breeding service in the region; - to analyze the effectiveness of state support for the breeding service of the region. We note that the technologies of cattle reproduction using the method of artificial insemination with sexed semen and the method of embryo transfer in agricultural enterprises in practice have proven their economic efficiency and high profitability indicators. But to obtain the described results, the source material (sexed seed and embryo), as well as the qualities of the donor and recipient, as well as systematic work in the industry of dairy and beef cattle breeding in the Samara region, are extremely important. Raised cows with high genetic potential, obtained from artificial insemination with sexed semen and embryo transplantation, can then be used as donor cows to obtain embryos and their further transplantation in other agricultural enterprises.

show abstract