2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ja00127k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of interference filters for spectral discrimination in solution-cathode glow discharge optical emission spectrometry

Abstract: Solution-cathode glow discharge optical emission performance is evaluated with interference filters and critically compared to a traditional spectrometer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that Cs signal was linear from 0.5-10,000 ppb (log-log plot slope of 0.97±0.03, R 2 = 0.99415), after which roll-off became apparent. If the Cs signal is assumed to maintain linearity to the 0.4-ppb detection limit, this corresponds to a linear working range of 4.4-orders of magnitude, similar to what is obtained for Cs with SCGD-AES (4.2 orders) [11]. Non-linearity beyond 10,000 ppb was found to be caused by condensation reactions that are preferential at high concentrations.…”
Section: Analytical Performancesupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was found that Cs signal was linear from 0.5-10,000 ppb (log-log plot slope of 0.97±0.03, R 2 = 0.99415), after which roll-off became apparent. If the Cs signal is assumed to maintain linearity to the 0.4-ppb detection limit, this corresponds to a linear working range of 4.4-orders of magnitude, similar to what is obtained for Cs with SCGD-AES (4.2 orders) [11]. Non-linearity beyond 10,000 ppb was found to be caused by condensation reactions that are preferential at high concentrations.…”
Section: Analytical Performancesupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Precision was found to be better than 16% RSD at 1000-ppb concentration. These precision values are somewhat worse than those obtained with SCGD and optical emission spectrometry, where RSD values in the range of 0.5-3.5% are common [9][10][11]29]. The comparatively poor precision here likely results from the method of ion sampling.…”
Section: Analytical Performancecontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another means to improve performance in SCGD-OES is to exploit the spatial emission structure of the discharge. Earlier studies have shown that emission is not homogeneous throughout the source [7,[21][22][23][24], but rather conforms to specific zones. Exploiting this inhomogeneity can lead to better analytical performance if emission is collected only from regions of the discharge where analyte species emit strongly and background emission (from continuum, elemental and/or molecular sources) is lower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Analysis of complex samples and expansion of SCGD-OES to the determination of molecular species has been achieved through pre-concentration [17,18] and replacemention chromatography [19]. The SCGD has also been coupled with smaller, more simplistic means of spectral sorting, including miniature spectrographs [20] and interference filters [21]. Combined, these advances have not only enhanced the potential portability, throughput, and applicability of SCGD-OES, but have also resulted in performance that is generally comparable to that obtained with radially viewed ICP-OES [9,15,16,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%