1966
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1966.15.172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Intradermal and Serologic Tests for the Diagnosis of Hydatid Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
4

Year Published

1970
1970
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
30
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, hydatid cyst was confirmed in 8 patients with negative IHA test. This finding is consistent with the report of Kagon et al 13 . Hydatid cyst filled with an amorphous mass may simulates the neoplastic lesions of the liver in imaging, which creates diagnostic problem 14 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, hydatid cyst was confirmed in 8 patients with negative IHA test. This finding is consistent with the report of Kagon et al 13 . Hydatid cyst filled with an amorphous mass may simulates the neoplastic lesions of the liver in imaging, which creates diagnostic problem 14 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Kagan (1968) considered HA as the method of choice, having an average sensitivity of 84 %. In our 75 patients with primary infection, the incidence of positives was 90 % in hepatic and 64 % in pulmonary cysts.…”
Section: The Haemagglutination (Ha) Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the 1950s, these tests were complemented or gradually replaced by better methods, such as indirect haemagglutination test, bentonite and latex agglutination tests, immunoprecipitation and immunoelectrophresis. Some of these tests were quite sensitive in detecting CE, especially of the liver, but a general problem was the low degree of specificity (Kagan, 1968;Varela-Diaz and Coltorti, 1976;Rickard and Lightowlers, 1986). Later on, the repertoire of antibody tests was extended by further procedures, including the indirect fluorescent antibody test, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and some secondary tests.…”
Section: Immunodiagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%