2017
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.22082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Kharma scale as a predictor of lower third molar extraction difficulty

Abstract: BackgroundThe Evaluation of the degree of lower third molar (L3M) extraction difficulty is extremely important for both clinicians and patients. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of a new index (Kharma scale) as a preoperative predictor index of the difficulty of surgical removal of impacted L3M.Material and MethodsExtraction difficulty of a series of 49-impacted L3M was predicted preoperatively by Kharma scale, and postoperative difficulty was assessed with a modified Parant scale.ResultsThe sensitivi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study was conducted from July 2020 to February This study recorded low SBP (SBP1) in the waiting room. It contrasted with some studies where the highest SBP values were taken in the waiting room [15][16][17]. The low SBP1 values throughout the surgical extraction, with a statistically significant difference of (p < 0.001) (Table 5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This study was conducted from July 2020 to February This study recorded low SBP (SBP1) in the waiting room. It contrasted with some studies where the highest SBP values were taken in the waiting room [15][16][17]. The low SBP1 values throughout the surgical extraction, with a statistically significant difference of (p < 0.001) (Table 5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Most of the studies used the operative time (measured from the incision to the last suture) as a post-operative variable indicating the degree of difficulty ( 17 , 18 - 21 , 24 - 28 ). Others used scales that evaluate the type of surgical technique ( 16 , 18 , 20 , 24 , 25 ) and only 1 registered a score reported by the surgeon after the surgery to subjectively classify difficulty ( 23 ). Few studies reported on the experience of the surgeon(s) operating the cases included in the studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies showed an improvement on the prediction of the surgical difficulty when using the new indices/scales or the proposed modifications of the pre-existing ones in comparison with pre-existing indices. Only 1 study failed to demonstrate improvement of a new index with respect to the modified Parant scale ( 24 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although indices based on clinical and radiographic parameters are comprehensive, they tend to be time-consuming. Most radiography-based indices being used currently in dentistry are based on conventional radiographic techniques [19][20][21]. The index used in the present study evaluated surgical difficulty on the basis of CBCT findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%