Evaluation of Life History Diversity, Habitat Connectivity, and Survival Benefits Associated with Habitat Restoration Actions in the Lower Columbia River and Estuary, Annual Report 2010

Diefenderfer, Heida L.; Johnson, Gary E.; Sather, Nichole K.; Skalski, John R.; Dawley, Earl M.; Coleman, André M.; Ostrand, Kenneth G.; Hanson, Kyle C.; Woodruff, Dana L.; Donley, Erin E.; Ke, Yinghai; Buenau, Kate E.; Bryson, Amanda J.; Townsend, Richard L.

doi:10.2172/1030884

Cited by 4 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These variations reflect the particular uses of habitats by life history stages as well as the proximity of habitats to stocks of migrating fish. For example, restoration sites that lack a strong upstream source of migrants, such as Vera Slough in Youngs Bay (G. Johnson et al 2007), have lower CPUEs and stock diversities than sites such as Cottonwood Island (reach C) that are available to a large number of ESUs (Diefenderfer et al 2011). Densities vary widely but can exceed 1.0 individual per meter square (ind/m 2 ) (Table 3.1).…”

Section: Chinook Salmonmentioning

confidence: 99%

Columbia Estuary Ecosystem Restoration Program. 2012 Synthesis Memorandum

Thom¹,

Sather²,

Roegner³

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

show abstract

Section: Chinook Salmonmentioning

confidence: 99%

Columbia Estuary Ecosystem Restoration Program. 2012 Synthesis Memorandum

Thom¹,

Sather²,

Roegner³

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Water-surface elevation and temperature data downloaded from in situ loggers after the study period ended on April 30, 2010, are also available for future analyses. Diefenderfer et al (2010) developed a habitat connectedness index for the extent to which a site is connected to the main LCRE channel that also could be an informative independent variable.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Macro-habitat was characterized by habitat type, including main channel, main-channel island, off-channel, off-channel island, confluence, and wetland (see Chapter 2). Site locations and landscape connectivity level (defined by Diefenderfer et al 2010) were also used to characterize macrohabitat. Site-scale characterization of the habitats included an evaluation of environmental and structural attributes.…”

Section: 3mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…TFM data on salmon density collected monthly at the SRD study area (see Chapter 2) are used to compute the life-history diversity index developed by Diefenderfer et al (2010).…”

Section: Fulfilling the Fcrps Biop's Reasonable And Prudent Alternativementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many ongoing research projects will continue to be informed by the TFM study. The data collected from this study has been used to inform the calculation of a life-history index (Diefenderfer et al 2010), which is part of the Salmon Benefits study (AFEP EST-P-09-01). Additional projects include the reference site study (conducted under FWP 2003-011-00) and the post-FCRPS survival study (AFEP EST-P-04-01).…”

Section: Research By Others In the Lcrementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Ecology of Juvenile Salmon in Shallow Tidal Freshwater Habitats of the Lower Columbia River, 2007?2010

Johnson¹,

Storch²,

Skalski³

et al. 2011

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Comparison of Connectivity Metrics on Watersheds and Implications for Water Management

Malvadkar

Scatena

Leon

2014

River Research & Apps

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Barriers within streams can affect riverine species' ability to access habitats and may reduce their population viability. Connectivity metrics attempt to quantify the impacts of barriers; however, little is known about their functioning when applied to dendritic habitats such as watersheds. Several graph-theoretic connectivity metrics were calculated on rivers originating in the Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico. These metrics were classified into two primary groups: metrics that count weighted paths through the stream network and metrics that predict the flow of organisms through a stream reach. Representative metrics from each of these categories were suggested to model the effects of dams and water intakes, respectively. Figure 6. a and b. These show Cloesness Centrality (CC) and Change in Coincidence Probability (DCP) values for the western branch of the Espritu Santo. This figure is available in colour online at wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/rra CONNECTIVITY METRICS ON WATERSHEDS 263 Figure 7. a and b. These show Closeness Centrality (CC) and Change in Coincidence Probability (DCP) values for the western branch of the Icacos/Rio Blanco. This figure is available in colour online at wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/rra U. MALVADKAR ET AL.

show abstract

Evaluation of Life History Diversity, Habitat Connectivity, and Survival Benefits Associated with Habitat Restoration Actions in the Lower Columbia River and Estuary, Annual Report 2010

Cited by 4 publications

References 13 publications

Columbia Estuary Ecosystem Restoration Program. 2012 Synthesis Memorandum

Columbia Estuary Ecosystem Restoration Program. 2012 Synthesis Memorandum

Ecology of Juvenile Salmon in Shallow Tidal Freshwater Habitats of the Lower Columbia River, 2007?2010

A Comparison of Connectivity Metrics on Watersheds and Implications for Water Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About