2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-3164-1_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Macroalgal Biomass for Removal of Hazardous Organic Dyes from Wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 71 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The common methods to remove heavy metals from drinking water contain adsorption, ion exchange, membrane separation, reverse osmosis, and chemical precipitation, etc. The adsorption method is widely favored by researchers because of its simple process, no toxic product formation, low cost, and reusability. However, although the cost of traditional adsorption materials such as natural clay, macroalgal biomass, and zeolite is low, most of them have some shortcomings, such as slow adsorption speed, low adsorption capacity, low specific surface area, lack of selectivity, and so on. Some new adsorption materials such as metal organic frameworks (MOFs) and coordination organic frameworks (COFs) have greater porosity and specific surface areas than traditional materials and can quickly and selectively remove trace heavy metals from drinking water after modification and functionalization, but their practical applications are limited due to their harsh preparation conditions, high cost, or poor stability in a wide pH range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common methods to remove heavy metals from drinking water contain adsorption, ion exchange, membrane separation, reverse osmosis, and chemical precipitation, etc. The adsorption method is widely favored by researchers because of its simple process, no toxic product formation, low cost, and reusability. However, although the cost of traditional adsorption materials such as natural clay, macroalgal biomass, and zeolite is low, most of them have some shortcomings, such as slow adsorption speed, low adsorption capacity, low specific surface area, lack of selectivity, and so on. Some new adsorption materials such as metal organic frameworks (MOFs) and coordination organic frameworks (COFs) have greater porosity and specific surface areas than traditional materials and can quickly and selectively remove trace heavy metals from drinking water after modification and functionalization, but their practical applications are limited due to their harsh preparation conditions, high cost, or poor stability in a wide pH range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%