2018
DOI: 10.3390/rs10101505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Manning’s n Roughness Coefficient in Arid Environments by Using SAR Backscatter

Abstract: The prediction of arid region flash floods (magnitude and frequency) is essential to ensure the safety of human life and infrastructures and is commonly based on hydrological models. Traditionally, catchment characteristics are extracted using point-based measurements. A considerable improvement of point-based observations is offered by remote sensing technologies, which enables the determination of continuous spatial hydrological parameters and variables, such as surface roughness, which significantly influen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RMSh value obtained from the plot‐scale DEM is 0.01 m. This agrees with the RMSh of desert pavement in a nearby arid environment with identical lithology (Sadeh et al ., ). Accordingly, we set a Manning roughness coefficient ( n ) of 0.024 (in s m ‐ 0 .33 ) which is the suggested value for fine gravel (Chow, ) and is similar to the value in Sadeh e t al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The RMSh value obtained from the plot‐scale DEM is 0.01 m. This agrees with the RMSh of desert pavement in a nearby arid environment with identical lithology (Sadeh et al ., ). Accordingly, we set a Manning roughness coefficient ( n ) of 0.024 (in s m ‐ 0 .33 ) which is the suggested value for fine gravel (Chow, ) and is similar to the value in Sadeh e t al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Accordingly, we set a Manning roughness coefficient ( n ) of 0.024 (in s m ‐ 0 .33 ) which is the suggested value for fine gravel (Chow, ) and is similar to the value in Sadeh e t al . (). To account for uncertainty in the Manning coefficient we considered a range of n values (0.02−0.028), consisting of the commonly used values for similar geomorphic units (Arcement and Schneider, ; Woolhiser et al, ; Sadeh et al ., , and references therein).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to general literature including only flood modeling (Tallat et al, 2011;Chinnarasri and Phothiwijit, 2016;Dimitriadis et al, 2016;Khattak et al, 2016;Patel et al, 2017;Afshari et al, 2018) and only Manning value from satellite image (Straatsma and Baptist, 2008;Forzieri et al, 2011;Bates, 2012;Sadeh et al, 2018) or only Manning value from sampling of terrain (Cowan, 1956;Jarsjö et al, 2015), Manning roughness coefficients was obtained by being used remote sensing and modified Cowan method to enhance the modelling accuracy and these data were also analyzed using photos showing flood level and computational model FLO 2D. The calibration of this model was made with Hydrologic Engineering Center-River Analysis System (HEC-RAS), which has 2D flow simulation functionality.…”
Section: Each Component Of the Equation Is Explained As Followsmentioning
confidence: 93%