2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scp.2018.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of mercury (Hg2+) adsorption capacity using exhausted coffee waste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to present, the adsorption technology has made great progress and it has unique advantages in the treatment of heavy metals and mercury [ 8 , 12 ]. And, adsorption technology has been largely applied to remove heavy metals and mercury in wastewater [ 6 , 13 ]. Common adsorbents in adsorption technology have been widely studied and applied, and include activated carbon [ 14 ], CNT [ 15 ], cellulose [ 16 ], titanium dioxide [ 17 ], silica gel [ 18 ], coffee waste [ 13 , 19 ], alkynyl carbon [ 20 ], clay [ 21 ], chitosan [ 22 ], functional groups [ 5 , 23 , 24 ], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to present, the adsorption technology has made great progress and it has unique advantages in the treatment of heavy metals and mercury [ 8 , 12 ]. And, adsorption technology has been largely applied to remove heavy metals and mercury in wastewater [ 6 , 13 ]. Common adsorbents in adsorption technology have been widely studied and applied, and include activated carbon [ 14 ], CNT [ 15 ], cellulose [ 16 ], titanium dioxide [ 17 ], silica gel [ 18 ], coffee waste [ 13 , 19 ], alkynyl carbon [ 20 ], clay [ 21 ], chitosan [ 22 ], functional groups [ 5 , 23 , 24 ], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3d. The maximum absorption is estimated to be 40.5 mg g -1 , higher than that of some absorbents reported in recent years (Mora Alvarez et al 2018, Saleh 2015, Solisio et al 2019, Tan et al 2016).…”
Section: Absorbing Performancementioning
confidence: 54%
“…Porosimetric analysis of parent and produced materials Table 4. Size distribution results of materials CFA derived Ag NPs doped nanocomposite 6.0 105.0 [31] Exhausted coffee waste 31.7 11.5 [42] Modified palm oil fuel ash 1.2 28.5 [43] Mercapto-modified bentonite 19.3 92.0 [44] Ag-X CFA derived zeolite 5.0 203 [1] Linde Type A CFA derived zeolite 0.31 - [29] Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%