2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of methods used to concentrate and detect hepatitis A virus in water samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
41
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we compared the performance of three relatively simple virus concentration methods to determine their efficiency in recovering two viral MST markers (HAdVs and HPyVs) in tap and river water samples spiked with raw sewage. The strategy of spiking with sewage rather than with cultured viruses (27,41,42) was used to better mimic a natural scenario that includes viruses in various states of intactness and disruption. Little has been published on the recovery efficiency of these MST viral markers through the processes of concentration, nucleic acid extraction, and purification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we compared the performance of three relatively simple virus concentration methods to determine their efficiency in recovering two viral MST markers (HAdVs and HPyVs) in tap and river water samples spiked with raw sewage. The strategy of spiking with sewage rather than with cultured viruses (27,41,42) was used to better mimic a natural scenario that includes viruses in various states of intactness and disruption. Little has been published on the recovery efficiency of these MST viral markers through the processes of concentration, nucleic acid extraction, and purification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The real-time PCR technique is an efficient tool in detecting HAV in environmental samples because it combines PCR amplification with the use of a probe to confirm the identity of the PCR product (De Paula et al, 2007). Results of a study carried out by Villar et al (2006) to evaluate methods used to concentrate and detect HAV in water samples also confirmed that compared to qualitative PCR, real-time PCR detects low concentrations of genome per millilitre and is more suitable than qualitative PCR for the detection of HAV RNA in environmental samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…La detección de partículas virales en las muestras ambientales depende en gran medida de la eficiencia de la técnica utilizada para establecer la concentración de partículas virales, como son la floculación con leche descremada, la ultrafiltración, la liofilización y la ultracentrifugación, entre otras (33)(34)(35)(37)(38)(39)47). En el 2013, Calgua, et al (38), publicaron un estudio en el que se registraron diferencias en el rendimiento de la técnica al medir el porcentaje de recuperación viral (38,47).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…En el 2013, Calgua, et al (38), publicaron un estudio en el que se registraron diferencias en el rendimiento de la técnica al medir el porcentaje de recuperación viral (38,47). La técnica de floculación con leche descremada demostró ser más eficiente y conveniente en cuanto a su costo-efectividad y el tiempo de procesamiento de la muestra (38).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified