2012
DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2012.641843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Modified Mehlich and Sikora Buffer Methods as an Alternative to Modified Woodruff Buffer in Determining Lime Requirement for Missouri Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nathan et al. (2012) found that the MM method is comparablel to the Woodruff buffer on Missouri soils where use of the Woodruff buffer has been well established since its inception. Mohebbi and Mahler (1988) did not test the performance of the Mehlich buffer on northern Idaho soils, but the replacement of the Woodruff method by the MM in the region where the Woodruff method originated suggests that the performance of the two buffers is comparable in other regions as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Nathan et al. (2012) found that the MM method is comparablel to the Woodruff buffer on Missouri soils where use of the Woodruff buffer has been well established since its inception. Mohebbi and Mahler (1988) did not test the performance of the Mehlich buffer on northern Idaho soils, but the replacement of the Woodruff method by the MM in the region where the Woodruff method originated suggests that the performance of the two buffers is comparable in other regions as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the North American Proficiency Testing Program (NAPT, 2016), six analytical laboratories currently use the Mehlich or MM buffer, eight laboratories use the AE buffer, 22 use the Woodruff, 24 use the Sikora, and 25 use the SMP for providing LRE. This indicates that, despite multiple studies demonstrating the effectiveness of the Mehlich or MM test at predicting LREs under various conditions (Dietzel et al., 2009; Godsey et al., 2007; Hoskins & Erich, 2008; Nathan et al., 2012; Sims & Dennis, 1989; Wolf, Beegle, & Hoskins, 2008), it is not in common usage. This may result from the Mehlich buffer being developed in the mid‐1970s, well after the other common buffer methods, such as SMP and Woodruff, were established for soil analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations