2013
DOI: 10.2478/pjvs-2013-0112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of morphological criteria of sperm quality before in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Abstract: The quality of sperm has a direct influence on the fertilization and developmental competence of embryos. In the literature we did not find defined criteria for evaluation of normal sperm parameters in various species of domestic mammals. Therefore we attempted to review evaluation of criteria of morphologically normal human sperm and their abnormalities. All sperm cells observed in the stained sample are classified as normal or abnormal. Any abnormalities in morphology of sperm have a negative effect on the o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results of two PN formation (49-55%) are similar with those of García-Roselló et al (2006a) (55.4-59.7%). Semen variation, sperm morphological abnormalities and poor sperm chromatin integrity have negative effect on the ICSI's outcome (Lasiene et al 2013). The selection of one boar and of an alternative to PVP, probably supported the results of the present study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Our results of two PN formation (49-55%) are similar with those of García-Roselló et al (2006a) (55.4-59.7%). Semen variation, sperm morphological abnormalities and poor sperm chromatin integrity have negative effect on the ICSI's outcome (Lasiene et al 2013). The selection of one boar and of an alternative to PVP, probably supported the results of the present study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Sperm morphology continues to be an important parameter in predicting fertility in both humans and animals (Keel et al, 2002;Maree et al, 2010;Lasiene et al, 2013). One solution in evaluation of sperm morphology is computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA), which reduces the subjectivism of morphological analysis (Gago et al, 1998), but these systems are relatively expensive and also not free of errors resulting from automation of the analysis process.…”
Section: Q4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in a small cellular nucleus and thus a small head, which renders routine evaluation of its morphology difficult (Bielańska‐Osuchowska & Sysa, 1998; Bielańska‐Osuchowska & Tishner, 2018; Shaman & Ward, 2006; Sharma & Agarwal, 2011). Sperm morphology remains an important factor in fertility evaluation (Keel et al., 2002; Lasiene et al., 2013; Maree et al., 2010; Oral et al., 2002). While other basic sperm parameters such as mobility and concentration are important, morphology seems to be the most significant, especially in artificial insemination, which is increasingly common (Singh et al., 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%