2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00254-008-1235-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of morphometric parameters of drainage networks derived from topographic maps and DEM in point of floods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
97
0
13

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
97
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…It shows infiltration capacity of the land and vegetation cover of the catchment (Macka 2001). Dd influences the output of water and sediment from the catchment area (Ozdemir and Bird 2009) and erosion susceptibility (Anon 1988;Gregory and Walling 1973;Bates 1981). Dd of the drainage basin depends on climatic condition and vegetation (Moglen et al 1998), landscape properties like soil and rock (Kelson and Wells 1989) and relief (Oguchi 1997).…”
Section: Drainage Density (Dd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows infiltration capacity of the land and vegetation cover of the catchment (Macka 2001). Dd influences the output of water and sediment from the catchment area (Ozdemir and Bird 2009) and erosion susceptibility (Anon 1988;Gregory and Walling 1973;Bates 1981). Dd of the drainage basin depends on climatic condition and vegetation (Moglen et al 1998), landscape properties like soil and rock (Kelson and Wells 1989) and relief (Oguchi 1997).…”
Section: Drainage Density (Dd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various morphometric parameters such as drainage pattern, stream order, bifurcation ratio, drainage density and other linear aspects are studied using remote sensing technique and topographical map (Mesa 2006). The surface runoff and flow intensity of the drainage system can be estimated using the geomorphic features associated with morphometric parameters (Ozdemir and Bird 2009). Pioneer work on basin morphometry has been carried out by Horton (1932Horton ( , 1945, Miller (1953), Smith (1950), and Strahler (1964).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elevations of 1,750-2,303 m were classified as mountains ( Figure 5 and Table 2). Figure 5 shows a small number of height intervals within the elevation range of 7-2,303 m. After the DEM classification of the geographical features ( Figure 4) and analysis, maps of the main stream drainage hierarchy, i.e., stream orders ( Figure 5 and Table 2), sub-basins ( Figure 6 and Table 3), and water-flow accumulation areas (Figure 7), were generated from the ASTER DEM data via the Hydrology tool in ArcGIS (Mark et al, 19984;O'Callaghan & Mark, 1984;Band, 1986;Ozdemir & Bird, 2009). The sub-basins were categorized according to the major river basins of the Kutahya Province in the Environmental Atlas of Turkey (Baykan 2004).…”
Section: Data Processing For Analysis and Risk Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%