2021
DOI: 10.7708/ijtte2021.11(3).01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Multi-Class Multi-Label Machine Learning Methods to Identify the Contributing Factors to the Severity of Animal-Vehicle Collisions

Abstract: Transportation is a fundamental tool to develop communities, cities, and countries on a larger scale, and more extensive transportation networks have developed ubiquitously. However, it is needed to consider the fact that animals also live in the same environment without using the same means, and there is always a chance of colliding with them while driving vehicles. Animal-Vehicle Collision (AVC) is a principal concern for transportation agencies and roadway hazards that influences human safety, property, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers used machine learning models to explore AVC data. Moghaddam et al proposed five machine learning-based prediction models for AVCs in the presence of categorical features, which were developed using eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), logistic regression, CatBoost, random forest, and light gradient boosting machine (LGBM) ( 15 ). The CatBoost model had the highest accuracy (78.52%) and was subsequently the most suitable model for predicting AVCs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers used machine learning models to explore AVC data. Moghaddam et al proposed five machine learning-based prediction models for AVCs in the presence of categorical features, which were developed using eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), logistic regression, CatBoost, random forest, and light gradient boosting machine (LGBM) ( 15 ). The CatBoost model had the highest accuracy (78.52%) and was subsequently the most suitable model for predicting AVCs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%