2016
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2016.1161078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of multisource data for glacier terrain mapping: a neural net approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature suggests various methods for mapping of supraglacial debris cover from remote sensing data including supervised and unsupervised classification techniques (Aniya et al, 1996;Shukla et al, 2010b;Shukla and Yousuf, 2016), techniques combining thermal and topographical properties (Shukla et al, 2010a;Bhambri et al, 2011), etc. In this study, to extract debris cover extent, we used the artificial neural network (ANN) technique.…”
Section: Methods Appliedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Literature suggests various methods for mapping of supraglacial debris cover from remote sensing data including supervised and unsupervised classification techniques (Aniya et al, 1996;Shukla et al, 2010b;Shukla and Yousuf, 2016), techniques combining thermal and topographical properties (Shukla et al, 2010a;Bhambri et al, 2011), etc. In this study, to extract debris cover extent, we used the artificial neural network (ANN) technique.…”
Section: Methods Appliedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, to extract debris cover extent, we used the artificial neural network (ANN) technique. Given the welldefined and well-distributed training sets, a three layer ANN model was iteratively optimized to find the most suitable network parameters and to arrive at the solution with least error (Shukla and Yousuf, 2016). The ANN classifies the debris-covered areas and snow/ice areas efficiently but sometimes fails in deep shadow regions, which were corrected manually during postprocessing.…”
Section: Methods Appliedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These along with other ancillary layers [Green/SWIR ratio, KT/Green/SWIR ratio, Normalized Difference Snow Index (NDSI), Snow Grain Size Index (SGI), variance and homogeneity] were used to refine the SPC process (see Table A.1, Supplementary material). These layers were chosen due to their successful application in many studies [22], [32] and their ability to differentiate between compositionally similar and shaded/crevassed facies.…”
Section: Research Area and Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, certain glacier facies lack spectral variability among them due to their compositional similarity (supraglacial/periglacial debris and valley-rock) or glacier's surface morphology (crevassed/ shadowed snow facies and ice facies). This can induce misclassification errors, which can although be reduced by using spectral plus ancillary data in the classification process [18], [22]. Acquisition time of the RD may highly influence the classification accuracy of the glacier facies due to their dynamicity in the input and RD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effective methodology that combines the versatility of OBIA and the robustness of the PBIA could reduce the dependability of multiple kinds of ancillary inputs. Shukla and Yousuf [123] explain the necessity of ancillary inputs for the reduction of misclassification errors. However, this study has successfully mapped facies not only without multiple ancillary inputs, but also without dependence on SWIR bands.…”
Section: Significancesmentioning
confidence: 99%