2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-021-05825-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Natural Building Stones’ Characterizations Using Ultrasonic Testing Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average time taken for the pulse to pass through the three faces of all the untreated specimen was 1.772 ms, indicating the high porosity of Gravina Calcarenite [64].…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average time taken for the pulse to pass through the three faces of all the untreated specimen was 1.772 ms, indicating the high porosity of Gravina Calcarenite [64].…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values obtained were averaged. Vaseline was not applied to avoid contamination of the specimens [64,65].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and on the conservation state of the stone. Vp has a strong correlation with UCS, to the extent that researchers have used the ultrasonic pulse velocity to predict the strength of different types of stones [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, numerous researchers have studied natural constructing stones and evaluated their mechanical and physical properties [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], but the majority of these studies did not focus on the integration between all physical and mechanical properties and the cost as an essential parameter for evaluation, which is considered as another challenge and causes homeowners' decisions to be hesitant, especially when these factors relate to the aesthetic criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%