1969
DOI: 10.1080/01944366908977953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Neighborhood Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The value placed on the physical environment depends on a respondent's background. Although planners support the importance of physical characteristics, residents consider social factors more important in judging a neighborhood (Lansing & Marans, 1969). Newly arrived residents point out that physical appearance is the most important factor for residential satisfaction, but long-time residents mention stress factors (e.g., tension with neighbors, level of income of the neighborhood, inability to communicate with others, racial discrimination, crime, etc.)…”
Section: Features Associated With Neighborhood Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value placed on the physical environment depends on a respondent's background. Although planners support the importance of physical characteristics, residents consider social factors more important in judging a neighborhood (Lansing & Marans, 1969). Newly arrived residents point out that physical appearance is the most important factor for residential satisfaction, but long-time residents mention stress factors (e.g., tension with neighbors, level of income of the neighborhood, inability to communicate with others, racial discrimination, crime, etc.)…”
Section: Features Associated With Neighborhood Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceptions of nearby nature also influence residential satisfaction in single and multiple family housing clustered together (Talbot and Kaplan, 1991). Other attributes that have been identified as important contributors to neighborhood satisfaction include upkeep and maintenance of homes and yards (Lansing and Marans, 1969;Sirgy and Cornwell, 2002), sense of safety (Cook, 1988), place to live (Ahlbrandt and Cunningham, 1979;Dahmann, 1981;Lu, 1999), appearance of the neighborhood (Parkes et al, 2002), and overall satisfaction (Galster and Hesser, 1981), as well as age, life cycle stage, income level, family size, home ownership, etc. (Francescato et al, 1987;Lu, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without trying to develop the issue of advocacy planning (Gans, 1969), it is worth considering whether, in the lives of many people, scenic analysis is truly relevant when they cannot gain a good education, job, housing, or nutrition. Professionals in many fields tend to have relatively homogeneous tastes and criteria as a result of their training (Sewell, 1971), and it has been shown (Lansing and Marans, 1969) that their tastes and criteria do not always mesh with the values held by those who are the nominal constituency. This review, nonetheless, will be limited to a survey of selected pragmatic aspects of scenic analysis and the examination of applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%