2022
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2021.3136243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Ocean Color Atmospheric Correction Methods for Sentinel-3 OLCI Using Global Automatic In Situ Observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One cannot say that this is a Case-1 ocean color specific algorithm anymore, because the comparisons with Case-2 dominated match-up data document good agreement over most of the spectrum (with specific problems described here). Our comparisons with AERONET-OC and other data show better agreements for IPF than previously reported (especially also with regard to the previous IPF version Collection 2), e.g., Liu et al, 2021;Tilstone et al, 2021;Vanhellemont and Ruddick, 2021;Li et al, 2022;or Windle et al, 2022. One influencing factor is certainly the consideration of recommended flags and the use of the same IPF-SVC gains for all AC methods (except for POLYMER).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ac Methodssupporting
confidence: 47%
“…One cannot say that this is a Case-1 ocean color specific algorithm anymore, because the comparisons with Case-2 dominated match-up data document good agreement over most of the spectrum (with specific problems described here). Our comparisons with AERONET-OC and other data show better agreements for IPF than previously reported (especially also with regard to the previous IPF version Collection 2), e.g., Liu et al, 2021;Tilstone et al, 2021;Vanhellemont and Ruddick, 2021;Li et al, 2022;or Windle et al, 2022. One influencing factor is certainly the consideration of recommended flags and the use of the same IPF-SVC gains for all AC methods (except for POLYMER).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ac Methodssupporting
confidence: 47%
“…In contrast, Polymer and C2RCC estimates are significantly lower than the in-situ and Acolite-derived R r s . Similar performance for Polymer and C2RCC (underestimating higher R r s values) are reported in [58] and [59]. This is attributed to the discrepancy between the in-situ water reflectance and a water reflectance model implemented in Polymer processor (F. Steinmetz, personal comm.).…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…The underestimations are partially caused by the bio-optical model in POLYMER that seems not suitable for optically complex waters, in which particulate and CDOM absorptions do not covary with chlorophyll concentration. The lower performance might also be caused by complex aerosols (Liu et al, 2021). The Ångström coefficient of aerosol in POLYMER is assumed to be 1, whereas the coefficient can vary in our study area between 0-1.8 with a median of 0.76 indicating that small size aerosol particles are present.…”
Section: Validation Of Ac Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 96%