2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of ochratoxin A exposure degree in two Portuguese cities through wheat and maize bread consumption during the winter 2007

Abstract: O PDF relativo ao artigo que solicita, não se encontra disponível em Acesso Aberto. Motivos: O editor não permite o depósito e disponibilização em acesso aberto do PDF que solicita. Para consultar o documento deve aceder ao endereço do editor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the results are divided according to the type of bread, a higher level of contamination in maize bread as opposed to wheat bread, both in incidence (70% vs. 12.9%) and mean level (0.44 vs. 0.02 ng/g), is revealed. More recently, still in the same region, bread samples from the winter of 2007 were evaluated [ 67 ]. The maize bread samples persistently featured higher levels of contamination in relation to wheat bread, although these differences were not as marked as before, neither in frequency of detection (86.7% vs. 80%) nor in mean levels (0.48 ± 0.29 vs. 0.34 ± 0.34 ng/g).…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, when the results are divided according to the type of bread, a higher level of contamination in maize bread as opposed to wheat bread, both in incidence (70% vs. 12.9%) and mean level (0.44 vs. 0.02 ng/g), is revealed. More recently, still in the same region, bread samples from the winter of 2007 were evaluated [ 67 ]. The maize bread samples persistently featured higher levels of contamination in relation to wheat bread, although these differences were not as marked as before, neither in frequency of detection (86.7% vs. 80%) nor in mean levels (0.48 ± 0.29 vs. 0.34 ± 0.34 ng/g).…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comparing the contamination data of wheat bread in the two studies [ 66 , 67 ] an increase in the contamination figures is evident, whether measured by incidence or mean level. Amongst the possible reasons two emerge as the most important ones: the first due to contribution of different environmental conditions, namely during storage of the grain or flour.…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This traditional storage method does not exclude damage by insects or fungi. Furthermore, grain is usually harvested with high moisture that produces pericarp fissures and subsequent fungal infections that are dangerous for human health (Butrón et al, 2008; D'Mello et al, 1999; Duarte et al, 2010; Morgavi and Riley, 2007). Technical solutions can be costly and can also have negative consequences for other parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%