Evaluation of patient wristbands and patient identification process in a training hospital in Turkey

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the utilisation of patient wristbands (PWs) and patient identification (PI) process in a training hospital in Ankara, Turkey. Design/methodology/approach This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted in a training hospital with 640 beds, accreditied by Joint Commission International. The views of 348 patients and 419 hospital personnel on the implementation of patient wristbands and identification process were evaluated. Findings The results indicated that lack of information among patients about the importance of PWs and the misknowledge among staff participants on when, where, and by whom PWs should be put on and verified were the weakest points in this hospital. Research limitations/implications PI process must be strictly implemented according to the standard procedures of patient safety. Both patients and hospital personnel should be trained continuously, and training sessions must be held to increase their awareness about the importance of PWs and identification process. Practical implications Finding new ways and using new methods for increasing knowledge about PI and PWs are necessary. Hospital management should prepare a written PI and PW policy and procedure documents by taking the views of patients and hospital personnel and share these with them. Originality/value This study incorporates the views and attitudes of patients and health care personnel in improving health care quality by increasing awareness about PI and wristbands.

Patient experience in co-production of care: perceptions about patient safety protocols

“…found that adherence to patient identification is deficient, considering that, in 71.6% of the analyzed cases, patients were identified, and the authors considered that the result should be close to 100% (24) . Research carried out in Turkey, in a JCI certified hospital, the results were alarming, in relation to the lack of knowledge of the patient about the use of the identification bracelet, as well as of the professionals about when it is essential that the conference is held, so that the care provided is safe in that concern (25) .…”

Wearing identification wristbands: implications for newborn safety in maternity hospitals

“…The use of materials that do not cause allergic reactions can increase the wearing rate of wristbands. 18 From the foregoing, it is necessary to develop educational support strategies and follow-up management actions to support safe and evidence-based practices. To achieve these goals, teamwork among professionals and managers is essential, since the uncritical use of scientific knowledge or partial implementation of protocols in health institutions, without articulation with professionals, results in unsuccessful safety and quality desired, and may incur risks to the patients' health and the credibility of the institution.…”

Efetividade da implantação de um ciclo de melhoria na identificação do paciente crítico

“…Um estudo realizado em três UTIs de um hospital de grande porte na Bahia evidenciou que apenas 59% dos pacientes utilizavam a pulseira de identificação, e em somente 37,6% deles os dados estavam legíveis, resultados semelhantes aos encontrados na avaliação inicial (7) . Já estudo realizado na Turquia mostrou uma taxa de 84,5% de pacientes identificados com pulseira (13) .…”