2020
DOI: 10.3390/biom10040516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Pharmacological and Phytochemical Profiles of Piptadeniastrum africanum (Hook.f.) Brenan Stem Bark Extracts

Abstract: The stem bark (SB) of Piptadeniastrum africanum (PA) has been extensively used in African traditional medicinal systems. However, there is a dearth of scientific information regarding its possible activity in the management of type II diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease, and skin hyperpigmentation disorders. This study therefore attempted to elucidate the in vitro inhibitory action of ethyl acetate, methanol, and water extracts of P. africanum stem bark (PA-SB) on α-amylase, α-glucosidase, acetylcholinesterase, buty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For SOP, its AChE inhibitory was strongly correlated to TFC and TPC (r = −0.86 and −0.85, p < 0.01), DPPH radical scavenging activity (r = −0.75, p < 0.01), and α-glucosidase inhibitory (r = 0.83, p < 0.01), while SOF was relatively low correlated to these indicators, and was clearly distinct from SOP. The correlation analyses above were consistent with the above conclusion of αglucosidase inhibitory, that the active ingredients in SOP and SOF are not consistent, resulting in differences in their activities such as α-glucosidase and AChE inhibitory abilities (41).…”
Section: And Cognitive Impairments In Older People With No Effective ...supporting
confidence: 77%
“…For SOP, its AChE inhibitory was strongly correlated to TFC and TPC (r = −0.86 and −0.85, p < 0.01), DPPH radical scavenging activity (r = −0.75, p < 0.01), and α-glucosidase inhibitory (r = 0.83, p < 0.01), while SOF was relatively low correlated to these indicators, and was clearly distinct from SOP. The correlation analyses above were consistent with the above conclusion of αglucosidase inhibitory, that the active ingredients in SOP and SOF are not consistent, resulting in differences in their activities such as α-glucosidase and AChE inhibitory abilities (41).…”
Section: And Cognitive Impairments In Older People With No Effective ...supporting
confidence: 77%
“…Further bioinformatics analyses were conducted for predicting the pharmacokinetic properties of these phytochemicals, especially the capability to cross the blood brain barrier that was considered as a cornerstone for supporting the reported evaluation of the extract protective effects in hypothalamic HypoE22 cells challenged with hydrogen peroxide and added to a cell medium as a pro-oxidant stimulus. In this context, the capability of P. mahaleb water extract in contrasting the hydrogen peroxide-induced turnover of dopamine [ 19 ] was evaluated. Considering the potential application of P. mahaleb in ulcerative colitis, we also investigated the protective effects of the water extract of P. mahaleb on isolated mouse colon specimens challenged with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to simulate in this ex vivo model the burden of oxidative stress and inflammation occurring in ulcerative colitis [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the evaluation of the in vitro antioxidant activity, different assays were employed, namely DPPH, CUPRAC and FRAP. The detailed procedures regarding each method are described in previous works [ 35 ]. Briefly, in the DPPH assay, the methanolic DPPH solution (0.004%) was mixed with mushroom extract solution, after which the absorbances were recorded at 517 nm after a 30 min incubation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%