2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(09)60069-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of phosphorus removal from wastewater by soils in rural areas in China

Abstract: Low-cost, easy-maintenance and high-efficiency decentralized wastewater treatment technologies are urgently needed in rural areas of China. Processes with high potential for phosphorus removal are of great interest. However, commonly used treatment methods often do not meet the strict criteria for removing phosphorus from rural wastewater. In order to search an economic and simple technology for phosphorus removal from the common bio-technologies effluent, seven soil types collected from different rural areas … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liang et al (2010) found that soil from rural areas of China with mineralogy similar to Fluvic Neosol (with high amount of kaolinite) showed high P content in wastewater due to the low adsorption capacity of the soil.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Liang et al (2010) found that soil from rural areas of China with mineralogy similar to Fluvic Neosol (with high amount of kaolinite) showed high P content in wastewater due to the low adsorption capacity of the soil.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of changes in soil chemical attributes depends mainly on local conditions, such as soil type, depth range, quality and quantity of used wastewaster in the system, and the kind of grown plant species (Corwin & Bradford, 2008;Kiziloglu et al, 2008;Xu et al, 2010;Liang et al, 2010;Leal et al, 2010). These changes may result in significant impacts in the soil quality (Fonseca et al, 2005;Herpin et al, 2007), or may not (Varallo et al, 2010;Duan et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, many individual residences in rural areas rely on septic tanks to dispose of their wastewater. Although septic tanks are an easy and safe technique, the concentration of suspended solids (SS), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) in effluents from septic tanks can hardly meet the discharge requirements (Liang et al, 2010). It is also noted that septic tanks are not correctly designed, built and operated in many situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decentralized wastewater treatment has been explored as an alternative for reducing pollutant load from rural regions, which ideally could cater the special needs of rural sewage treatment such as tolerance of variable pollutant loads, stable and high removal efficiencies of nutrients and organic compounds, and low construction and operation costs. There are mainly two types of decentralized wastewater treatment technologies for rural sewage treatment: (1) activated sludge process such as packed bed biofilm reactor (Liang et al (2010a)), cyclic activated sludge system (CASS) ), and anaerobic sludge reactor; (2) land treatment process such as stabilization pond (Verbyla et al (2013)), constructed wetland (Li et al (2009), Wu et al (2011), and soil infiltration system (Liang et al (2010b)). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%