“…Many of the codon optimization software lack citations. Of these software packages, citations have been found for JCat and OPTIMIZER for expression systems such as E. coli (Fahimi et al, 2016;Guo et al, 2016;Karkhah and Amani, 2016;Zhao et al, 2016), S. cerevisiae (Ask et al, 2013;Guadalupe-Medina et al, 2013;Li et al, 2015;Milne et al, 2015;Solis-Escalante et al, 2013), N. benthamiana (Binder et al, 2014), HEK293 cells (Shah et al, 2015), B. subtilis (Reilman et al, 2014), Caulobacter crescentus (Ko et al, 2013), Pseudomonas putida (Dammeyer et al, 2011(Dammeyer et al, , 2013, Salmonella typhimurium (Manuel et al, 2011), S. lividans (Dubeau et al, 2009), wheat (Mih alik et al, 2015, transplastomic tobacco plants (chloroplast translation system) (Occhialini et al, 2015), Plasmodium berghei (Singer et al, 2015), Spodoptera frugiperda (Geisler et al, 2015), S. pneumoniae (Overkamp et al, 2013), A. marginale (Pierl e et al, 2013), R. pomeroyi (Green et al, 2013), L. acidophilus (Askelson et al, 2014), C. reinhardtir (Erpel et al, 2016), Y. lipolytica (Matthaus et al, 2014), S. elongates (van der Woude et al, 2016), and baculovirus (Maghodia et al, 2016). While it is encouraging that codon optimization software programs are used for a variety of species and purposes, most of the papers do not compare yields of native and codon optimized sequences, so yield comparisons cannot be made.…”