2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6090(00)01356-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of precursors for chemical vapor deposition of ruthenium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, limitations reduce the applicability of these substances; Ru(C 5 H 5 ) 2 [2,3] and Ru(acac) 3 [1,4] decompose at such high temperatures that they are incompatible with integrated circuits, whilst the carbonyl complexes Ru(CO) 5 and Ru 3 (CO) 12 [1,5] are toxic, and RuO 4 may be explosive when heated to 100 C and above. [6] Another problem is a significant carbon contamination of the thin films when Ru(C 5 H 4 Et) 2 , [3] [(Ru(C 5 H 5 )(CO) 2 ] 2 , [7] Ru(tmhd) 3 (tmhd = 2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dione), [8±10] Ru(CO) 2 (tmhd) 2 , [11] and Ru(1,5-COD)(g 3 -allyl) 2 (1,5-COD = 1,5-cyclooctadiene) [12] are used. So far, an optimal Ru MOCVD-precursor has not been found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, limitations reduce the applicability of these substances; Ru(C 5 H 5 ) 2 [2,3] and Ru(acac) 3 [1,4] decompose at such high temperatures that they are incompatible with integrated circuits, whilst the carbonyl complexes Ru(CO) 5 and Ru 3 (CO) 12 [1,5] are toxic, and RuO 4 may be explosive when heated to 100 C and above. [6] Another problem is a significant carbon contamination of the thin films when Ru(C 5 H 4 Et) 2 , [3] [(Ru(C 5 H 5 )(CO) 2 ] 2 , [7] Ru(tmhd) 3 (tmhd = 2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dione), [8±10] Ru(CO) 2 (tmhd) 2 , [11] and Ru(1,5-COD)(g 3 -allyl) 2 (1,5-COD = 1,5-cyclooctadiene) [12] are used. So far, an optimal Ru MOCVD-precursor has not been found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated the carbon concentration by taking the area ratio of the Ru 3d 3/2 and Ru 3d 5/2 XPS peaks, assuming that the Ru 3d 5/2 peak arises only from Ru and that the C signal overlaps only the Ru 3d 3/2 signal. [14,19] For pure ruthenium, the ratio of the Ru 3d 3/2 to Ru 3d 5/2 XPS peak areas is about 3:2, which corresponds to the theoretical value due to spin-orbit interactions of d-electrons [19,20] . The excess of carbon present in the Ru film would show the variation of the observed 3d 3/2 /3d 5/2 peak ratio from the ideal value.…”
Section: Film Compositionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Moreover, the observed growth behavior is somewhat different to that reported in the literature, where growth of the RuO 2 film decreased at temperatures above 400 C due to the formation of volatile oxide compounds RuO 3 (g) and RuO 4 (g). [10,18] This discrepancy is caused by the natural characteristics of complex 1, as it seems to be highly effective in giving off its organic ligands. Formation of both volatile oxide compounds and adsorbed oxygen and carbon atoms that may block the precursor adsorption sites would be significantly suppressed for our experiments conducted using low O 2 flow rate and reduced system pressure.…”
Section: Deposition Of Ruo 2 Thin Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] Most recently, even the considerably less volatile cyclopentadienyl dimer complex [(C 5 H 5 )Ru(CO) 2 ] 2 has proven useful for depositing Ru thin films employing a bench-scale CVD facility. [10] In the latter study, the main goal was to develop a generalized screening method for new CVD source reagents. Recently, we have established a new program designed to tailor and synthesize novel precursors that may be suitable for the growth of ruthenium and ruthenium oxide thin films.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%