2019
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2019.2934943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Printed P(VDF-TrFE) Pressure Sensor Signal Quality in Arterial Pulse Wave Measurement

Abstract: In this contribution, we evaluate the performance of an additively fabricated piezoelectric poly(vinylidenefluoride-cotrifluoroethylene) (P(VDF-TrFE)) based dynamic pressure sensor in non-invasive arterial pulse wave (PW) measurement. Additively fabricated piezoelectric sensors have high potential for the realization of affordable and unobtrusive PW measurement systems which could enable the long-term monitoring of patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, the accuracy and reliability of such sens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…54 The broken finger electrodes are not able to participate in charge collection when pressure is applied, and this will lead to a lower measured sensitivity. It is also possible an ≈7 times higher value (MIM ≈ 26.9 pC/N vs IDE ≈ 3.8 pC/N) in normal mode as shown previously by Laurila et al 39 At the same time, however, it had up to 33 times higher capacitance compared to a similar thickness IDE structure (MIM ≈ 1.57 nF vs IDE ≈ 51.10 pF). As the output voltage of the sensor is determined by the equation V = Q/C, this will result in higher voltage sensitivity for the IDE-based structure as shown in Figure 3a.…”
Section: Normal Mode Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…54 The broken finger electrodes are not able to participate in charge collection when pressure is applied, and this will lead to a lower measured sensitivity. It is also possible an ≈7 times higher value (MIM ≈ 26.9 pC/N vs IDE ≈ 3.8 pC/N) in normal mode as shown previously by Laurila et al 39 At the same time, however, it had up to 33 times higher capacitance compared to a similar thickness IDE structure (MIM ≈ 1.57 nF vs IDE ≈ 51.10 pF). As the output voltage of the sensor is determined by the equation V = Q/C, this will result in higher voltage sensitivity for the IDE-based structure as shown in Figure 3a.…”
Section: Normal Mode Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Furthermore, the piezoelectric and voltage sensitivity of three different P­(VDF-TrFE) thickness IDE sensors were compared to a conventional piezoelectric pressure sensor based on MIM structure. The piezoelectric sensitivity of a MIM structure based on the same P­(VDF-TrFE) material had an ≈7 times higher value (MIM ≈ 26.9 pC/N vs IDE ≈ 3.8 pC/N) in normal mode as shown previously by Laurila et al At the same time, however, it had up to 33 times higher capacitance compared to a similar thickness IDE structure (MIM ≈ 1.57 nF vs IDE ≈ 51.10 pF). As the output voltage of the sensor is determined by the equation V = Q / C , this will result in higher voltage sensitivity for the IDE-based structure as shown in Figure a.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 5d exhibits the location of the carotid artery and the temporal artery with benchmark arterial pulse waveforms obtained by medical gold standards, such as invasive arterial lines. [ 84–88 ] For the carotid arterial pulse (CAP), a HRPS was placed on the neck over the carotid artery packaged between two medical tapes (3M Tegaderm), which induced a preload of around 1.5 kPa over the HRPS as shown in Figure 5e. While the human subject held his breath, the CAP was clearly visible without any amplification or signal processing (Figure 5f).…”
Section: Demonstrations For Hrpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screen printed wearable piezoelectric devices have been developed for monitoring physiological signals ( Fares et al., 2020 ; Gonçalves et al., 2019 ; Laurila et al., 2019 ; Sato et al., 2019 ). Sekine et al.…”
Section: Manufacturing Techniques For Flexible Wearable Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%