2019
DOI: 10.1017/s1479262119000297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of processing type tomato plant genetic resources (Solanum lycopersicumL.) for their nutritional properties in different environments

Abstract: In this work, 10 processing type Hungarian tomato gene bank accessions were investigated in a 3-year open-field experiment together with three commercial varieties for quantifying the genotype × environment interaction for their total soluble solids, total acid, dry matter, lycopene, total polyphenol content and antioxidant activity. Results showed remarkable differences of accessions in phytonutrient content over the 3 years (environments). Genotype main effect plus genotype × environment interaction biplots … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The traits analyzed with GGE have different characteristics; TSS and SAR_or contain information about the taste of PGRs, while the other parameters are related to the non-enzymatic (TPC, FRAP, CUPRAC, ABTS, DPPH) and enzymatic (AsPOX, POX, GST) antioxidant status of the tomato samples. In order to analyze the bioactive traits of PGRs in an aggregated way, a previously applied methodology of Csambalik et al [46] was employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The traits analyzed with GGE have different characteristics; TSS and SAR_or contain information about the taste of PGRs, while the other parameters are related to the non-enzymatic (TPC, FRAP, CUPRAC, ABTS, DPPH) and enzymatic (AsPOX, POX, GST) antioxidant status of the tomato samples. In order to analyze the bioactive traits of PGRs in an aggregated way, a previously applied methodology of Csambalik et al [46] was employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the widely and generally mentioned higher nutritional value of PGRs, the availability of the data on bioactive compounds regarding Hungarian tomato landraces is limited [45,46], especially in relevance to different production systems. In this study, the phytonutrient profiles consisting of phenolics, antioxidants and enzyme activities of seven Hungarian tomato PGRs and a commercial variety grown in organically certified openfield and polytunnel conditions were investigated throughout two years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenotypic diversity arises not only from different genetic backgrounds, but also due to environmental conditions, especially for traits related to nutritional value (Csambalik et al ., 2019). In principal, heterogeneity of tomato landraces related to fruit yield is expected to be wide between different climates, soil fertilization and irrigation regimes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geographic pattern of diversity of tomato landraces in the Mediterranean region has been widely documented (Terzopoulos and Bebeli, 2010; Cebolla-Cornejo et al ., 2013; Parisi et al ., 2016; Figàs et al ., 2018; Lázaro, 2018; Gonias et al ., 2019). Typically, landraces serve as a valuable reservoir of genes for fruit quality and abiotic stress tolerance, while they lack pathogen resistance genes (Sacco et al ., 2015; Csambalik et al ., 2019; Gonias et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other cases, hybrid tomatoes proved to be more tolerant against late blight [37,38]. There are reports on Hungarian tomato landraces, with evaluated yield of determinate tomato gene bank accessions and consumer preferences to them [39] together with comprehensive measurements on the yield marketability, utility and nutritional properties of several indeterminate accessions [40][41][42]. However, the disease susceptibility of these accessions has not been analyzed to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%