2003
DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.94.560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of Japanese Version of International Prostate Symptom Score and BPH Impact Index

Abstract: Japanese translations of IPSS and BII were shown to be reliable, valid and one-dimensional instruments in the Japanese patients. They would be equivalent to the original English questionnaires.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16.3% of Pacific Islanders vs 4.9% of NZ Europeans. NZ Europeans had the highest proportion that never attended a doctor (10.5%), although the ethnic differences were not statistically significant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16.3% of Pacific Islanders vs 4.9% of NZ Europeans. NZ Europeans had the highest proportion that never attended a doctor (10.5%), although the ethnic differences were not statistically significant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The range for each symptom score was 0-5, with an overall possible score of 0-35. The summation of the symptom score provides a composite score which classifies the respondent as being asymptomatic (score 0), mild symptoms (score 1-7), moderate symptoms (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) or severe (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35). The AUA overall QoL question was used to score overall satisfaction about current urinary symptoms from 1 to 6, with 1 being 'delighted' and 6 being 'terrible' [1].…”
Section: Between January 2000 and February 2002mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the IPSS, scoring ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 35 (maximal symptoms). LUTS severity was classified into three categories: mild (0-7), moderate (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) and severe (20-35) and for the QoL index, the range is 0 (delighted) to 6 (terrible) [16]. The storage subscore was defined as the sum of scores for questions 2, 4 and 7 on the IPSS and the voiding subscore was the sum of scores for questions 1, 3, 5 and 6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core lower urinary tract symptom score (CLSS) questionnaire was recently developed by Dr Homma's group, 1 and had been used as a reliable instrument for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) assessment in several studies. 2,3 However, the psychometric properties of the CLSS still need to be further evaluated.…”
Section: Editorial Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] The ICI recommended the use of the ICIMaleSF questionnaire for men and ICIFemaleSF for women on assessing LUTS; however, they could contain too extensive or variable questions. [7][8][9] The CLSS questionnaire was reported by Homma et al in 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%