2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.02.013
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Radiofrequency Ablation Irrigation Type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our surprise, our study revealed that HNS merely only had a slight advantage over NS in lesion creation, and the results did not achieve statistical significance, in accord with a recently reported study by Tschabrunn et al 15 which described no difference in lesion size between RF ablation with NS versus HNS irrigation in a porcine healthy beating left ventricular model. However, HNS outperformed NS irrigated ablation in lesion width, as depicted in our multivariable linear regression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…To our surprise, our study revealed that HNS merely only had a slight advantage over NS in lesion creation, and the results did not achieve statistical significance, in accord with a recently reported study by Tschabrunn et al 15 which described no difference in lesion size between RF ablation with NS versus HNS irrigation in a porcine healthy beating left ventricular model. However, HNS outperformed NS irrigated ablation in lesion width, as depicted in our multivariable linear regression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Recent preclinical work has demonstrated that the utility of low-flow, half-normal saline administered at 40 W for 30 seconds (10 seconds of which involved the ramp-up) and 8 to 14 g of CF led to similar lesions as those attained with normal saline in vivo, albeit the former were slightly deeper (p = 0.07) with an increased incidence of steam pop suggestive of increased tissue heating. 50 This is in keeping with the findings of another recent preclinical study by Leshem et al 51 More adequately powered clinical studies analyzing lesion durability and safety are needed prior to determining the optimal choice of irrigant for RFA.…”
Section: Catheter Optimizationsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…A significantly higher incidence of steam pops were noted in the HNS RFA group, with similar lesion depths, widths, and areas between groups. 6 Bennett et al performed a similar analysis utilizing both HNS and D5W irrigant in a beating heart ovine model. Here, ablation was delivered at 30 W, 60-s duration targeting 10-20 g contact force in endocardium and 5-10 g in the epicardium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior ex‐vivo and in vivo animal studies have demonstrated the validity of this technique 5–7 . To date, few analyses have been performed to explore the ex vivo characteristics of HNS irrigated ablation in human hearts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%