1999
DOI: 10.1080/00063659909461151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of radiotelemetry methods in measuring habitat choice by young Golden PloverPluvialis apricariachicks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our survival rates of chicks (Fig. 2) were marginally higher than the 19% (six of 31) of radiotagged chicks that survived in the north Pennines (Whittingham et al 1999), where predation by Stoats was the main cause of mortality (Whittingham et al 2002). Broods hatching at the end of May or beginning of June appeared to have the greatest chance of survival (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our survival rates of chicks (Fig. 2) were marginally higher than the 19% (six of 31) of radiotagged chicks that survived in the north Pennines (Whittingham et al 1999), where predation by Stoats was the main cause of mortality (Whittingham et al 2002). Broods hatching at the end of May or beginning of June appeared to have the greatest chance of survival (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although relatively high levels of predation can occur on some grouse moors (Whittingham 1996, Whittingham et al 1999, the low level of nest and chick predation at Snake Summit support the hypothesis that grouse moor management can enhance Golden Plover breeding success, and may explain the association between Golden Plovers and grouse moors (Tharme et al 2001). Experimental work to examine the effects of temporal changes in predator control upon Golden Plover breeding success is required to confirm this (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…n is the total number of intervals (B2 days in godwits, B3 days in lapwings) for each type siblings, as in the godwits, but a study in the UK did observe that poor condition induced by repeated handling reduced the survival of lapwing chicks (F. Sharpe et al, unpublished). Other studies have generally not found adverse effects of back-or leg-mounted tags in chicks of shorebirds and gamebirds (Kenward et al 1993;Whittingham et al 1999;Grant 2002). Nevertheless, there may be effects of telemetry studies that cannot be detected by within-brood comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential drawback of radio-tagging is that the transmitters may affect the chicks' behaviour or physiology and reduce their survival prospects. Thus, it is important to check whether such negative effects influence the outcome of telemetry studies (Kenward et al 1993;Whittingham et al 1999;Grant 2002;Krapu et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transmitter is attached to the bird with glue. Various types of glue have been used, including cyanoacrylate glue, bird epoxy (obtained from Eclectic Products Inc., 4507 Willametter Blvd, Pineville, LA 71360 USA) and Saltair Ostemy Adhesive Solution (Whittingham et al 1999). Depending on the age of the bird, and timing of molt, transmitters glued to the back will remain on the bird for a few days to months.…”
Section: Radio Telemetrymentioning
confidence: 99%