2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of recombinase-based isothermal amplification assays for point-of-need detection of SARS-CoV-2 in resource-limited settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19). We believe the drop in sensitivity was caused by a decline in the performance of RPA at lower temperatures 51 , since Cas13 detection alone performed well at 25 °C and 37 °C (Supplementary Fig. 20).…”
Section: Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19). We believe the drop in sensitivity was caused by a decline in the performance of RPA at lower temperatures 51 , since Cas13 detection alone performed well at 25 °C and 37 °C (Supplementary Fig. 20).…”
Section: Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it should be noted that RPA kits are currently commercialized by a single company, TwistDx [now part of Abbott Laboratories, US ( 66 )] which has full control over the price and availability of the kits. RPA has not yet been approved by the food and drug administration (FDA), and for now is intended for research-only applications ( 65 , 67 ).…”
Section: Polymerase Chain Reaction Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplifica...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had a sudden devastating effect on global public health, taking more than 5.9 million lives alongside 445 million cases, while also collapsing the worldwide economy [ 1 ]. Maintaining regular diagnosis is important to prevent inadvertent infectious viral shedding and spreading in our communities, including asymptomatic infected persons and elders with disease comorbidities [ 2 , 3 ]. Despite the availability of many detection systems, including those based on microfluidic analytic, serological [ 4 , 5 ] and nucleic acid detection, there is room to develop efficient and effective systems for the diagnosis of COVID-19 and, thereby, control this crisis [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific and precise viral nucleic acid detection using the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has dominated serological testing; it has become the gold standard testing method, despite having limitations in, for example, sample storage, temperature control during incubation, expense, the need for purification and long analysis times, and false negative results arising from viral evolution, making it unsuitable for use at the point-of-care (POC) level [ 4 , 5 ]. Furthermore, RT-PCR and qPCR require standard/advanced PCR machines with trained personnel, so they are not suitable for POCT [ 2 ]. Considering the role of fomites in spreading infection, POC testing (POCT) is a high priority for diagnosis because it minimizes the need for complicated clinical practices and helps to accelerate decision-making in regard to optimized treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%