2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of reliability of traditional and computerized neurobehavioral tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…N=26, Lejuez et al, 2003a), and is comparable to samples used in test-retest studies of behavior and risk-taking (e.g., computerized behavioral tests, N=35, Sakong et al, 2007; go/no go, N=28, Langenecker et al, 2007; probability discounting, N=18, Ohmura et al, 2006; delay discounting, N=22, Ohmura et al, 2006; personal safety, N=29, Punakallio, 2004; gambling, N=34, Weinstock et al, 2004; empathy, N=24, Lawrence et al, 2004; self-harm, N=38, Fliege et al, 2006), several of which relate to performance on the BART (see Lejuez et al, 2002; 2003a; 2003b). The present sample size is adequate for preliminary data on test-retest characteristics of the BART.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…N=26, Lejuez et al, 2003a), and is comparable to samples used in test-retest studies of behavior and risk-taking (e.g., computerized behavioral tests, N=35, Sakong et al, 2007; go/no go, N=28, Langenecker et al, 2007; probability discounting, N=18, Ohmura et al, 2006; delay discounting, N=22, Ohmura et al, 2006; personal safety, N=29, Punakallio, 2004; gambling, N=34, Weinstock et al, 2004; empathy, N=24, Lawrence et al, 2004; self-harm, N=38, Fliege et al, 2006), several of which relate to performance on the BART (see Lejuez et al, 2002; 2003a; 2003b). The present sample size is adequate for preliminary data on test-retest characteristics of the BART.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For each board, the experimenter counts the number of words that have been read or colors named within the 45 seconds. The test-retest reliability of all these cognitive tests was moderate to high [12,13]. The total number of direct and indirect digit recalls in correct order, a ratio score of TMT (i.e., TMTB/TMTA) and a ratio score of Stroop (i.e., (''No Interference" [color])/''Interference" [color - word]) were used as outcomes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Computerized Neurocognitive Function Test employing the computer can assess cognitive function employing the advantages of the computer, such as standardizing the presentation of stimuli and the reaction process, securing the test-retest reliability, accuracy of measurement, and ease of explaining the procedure and results [11]. In addition, since it has a high correlation with MMSE, it can be used not only for assessment of the cognitive function of the general population but also for assessment of the cognitive function and evaluation of the therapeutic effect of brain injured patients [10].…”
Section: Necessity Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%