2016
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.869.567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Residual Stresses in Welded ASTM A36 Structural Steel by Metal Active Gas (MAG) Welding Process

Abstract: The use of structural steel in the industry is increasing every day, and the study of stress state after welding has been shown to be of great importance. Nondestructive techniques become quite appropriate to be performed before and during the service component of welded, and thus ensure its integrity. The magnetic technique to be nondestructive, and easy to apply in the field, has potential to be an inspection tool for measuring residual stresses and other microstructural parameters. In this work it was possi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent studies, MBN data has been compared with X-ray diffraction and hole drilling method [15,16]. In these experiments, the hole drilling method was performed with a hole with 2 mm of depth, but with extensometer placed at the surface [15,16].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Techniques As X-ray Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent studies, MBN data has been compared with X-ray diffraction and hole drilling method [15,16]. In these experiments, the hole drilling method was performed with a hole with 2 mm of depth, but with extensometer placed at the surface [15,16].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Techniques As X-ray Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent studies, MBN data has been compared with X-ray diffraction and hole drilling method [15,16]. In these experiments, the hole drilling method was performed with a hole with 2 mm of depth, but with extensometer placed at the surface [15,16]. Thus, some variation of presented results [15,16] should be due to the fact that these different techniques (MBN, X-ray diffraction, and hole drilling) assess stress at different depths.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Techniques As X-ray Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of the residual stress on welded ASTM A36 steel plates through the MAG method has been examined using non-destructive techniques such as Magnetic Barkhausen Noise and X-ray Diffraction [28,29]. Moreover, process parameters such as the welding current and speed, arc voltage and distance, the laser-to-arc distance at the penetration depth, bead shape, arc stability, spark, and plasma formation have also been investigated in carbon steel [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%