Evaluation of Return to Investment in Human Capital in Lithuania in the Context of Other Countries

Abstract

The research literature presents a strong positive relationship between economic development and human capital, which is usually measured by education. The standard approach assumes that an individual invests some time in education, and then it shows up in terms of enhanced future earnings as a return, i.e. investment in education helps to increase the individuals' future earnings. How much to invest in education is one of the most important economic decisions that individuals have to face. Hundreds of studies in many different countries and time periods have confirmed that bettereducated individuals earn higher wages, suffer less unemployment and work in more prestigious occupations, have other social returns like honour and status than their less-educated counterparts. This positive correlation between education (schooling) and earnings is well established in the empirical literature. Despite the fact, that the rate of return to education (human capital) has been widely studied in the world since the late 1950s and even though hundreds of papers have studied this issue in various countries at different time periods and with alternative estimation methods, studies concerning Lithuania's case remain limited. This study focuses on the evaluation of investments in human capital. Problem question raised: Once education, which plays a very important role in development and growth of a country, is treated as an investment, the immediate natural question is: what is the profitability of this investment comparing to alternatives? Therefore it is important to investigate the return to investment in education in order to evaluate effectiveness of investments in human capital in Lithuania and compare it to the other countries in the development process. The object of the researchthe return to investment in human capital. The aim of the research is to estimate the private rate of return to human capital in Lithuania and to study the changes of these returns during the time (2003-2011) and compare calculated data with analogical data in other countries. In the first part of the paper the concept of "human capital" is defined, before estimating the returns to human capital. In order to reveal the return to investment in human capital, it was limited to investment in education overview. Further, the research methodology is presented. One of the main ways to calculate the rate of returns to investment in human capital, which is used in the empirical practice, is the "full-discounting" or "elaborate" method, which consists in calculating the internal rate of return, was employed. 2003-2011 statistical data were used for the study. The conclusions reveal that the rate of return to investment in human capital varies over time and rate of return for females is lower than for males. The rate of return of investment in human capital varies, reflecting the effect of constantly decreasing income tax, average wage and cost changes of higher increments of education (increase / decrease). After comparing Lithuania's and other countries' r...

Strategic steps for Nigerian hospitality human capital development

“…Tamasauskiene and Poteliene (2013) evaluated the IRR on HCD in Lithuania compared with other countries and determined that persons who benefited from a government education subsidy have a higher IRR. Government-educated persons had an IRR from 12.2 to 14 percent while uneducated persons had a IRR ranging from 8.4 to 9.8 percent (Tamasauskiene and Poteliene, 2013). The maximum IRR achieved by an uneducated person was below the minimum realized by the educated, which supported the notion that education plays a role in wage differentials (Inoue et al, 2013;Tamasauskiene and Poteliene, 2013).…”

“…Government-educated persons had an IRR from 12.2 to 14 percent while uneducated persons had a IRR ranging from 8.4 to 9.8 percent (Tamasauskiene and Poteliene, 2013). The maximum IRR achieved by an uneducated person was below the minimum realized by the educated, which supported the notion that education plays a role in wage differentials (Inoue et al, 2013;Tamasauskiene and Poteliene, 2013).…”

Perceived quality of private education and fears of stratification: Investigating the propositions of human capital theory by exploring the case of Colombia

“…This positive correlation between education (schooling) and earnings is well established in the empirical literature. For example, Tamasauskiene and Poteliene (2013: 198), assert that “…better educated individuals suffer less unemployment, work in more prestigious occupations and have more of other social returns like honour and status than their less well-educated counterparts”.…”

The Impact of Human Capital on Labour Market: Lithuanian Case

“…Competitiveness is frequently measured not only by accumulated net economic asset, but also by other economic model criterias, such as creativity, knowledge and environmental conditions. Rate of return of investment in human capital is increased by the aquired knowledge (Tamasauskiene & Poteliene, 2013). So fast-growing and economically competitive region is that one that has a high number of knowledge acquiring labour force.…”