2017
DOI: 10.4103/tdj.tdj_10_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of root canals filled with bioceramic sealer after retreatment with two different techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Similar results were recorded using chloroform with PTUR as the results showed that chloroform presented the highest value for remaining root canal filling when used as a solvent. 13 However, the results of the present study came in contradiction with other studies in which there was no difference in the capacity between these three solvents. 1,9,14 This could be attributed to the different evaluation methods as they used immersion weight loss evaluation, while in this study a more clinical method using solvents and rotary files till reaching the working length.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…3 Similar results were recorded using chloroform with PTUR as the results showed that chloroform presented the highest value for remaining root canal filling when used as a solvent. 13 However, the results of the present study came in contradiction with other studies in which there was no difference in the capacity between these three solvents. 1,9,14 This could be attributed to the different evaluation methods as they used immersion weight loss evaluation, while in this study a more clinical method using solvents and rotary files till reaching the working length.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It compared two sealers with or without chloroform using maxillary incisor with straight root. The study contradicted Sherif et al's study (12) because this study exhibited that using chloroform left less filling material than without chloroform and BC sealer showed more remnants obturated material than AH Plus. Furthermore, this study supported the finding of Hess et al in 2011 that AH Plus could regain 100% patency and BC sealer could gain patency when used solvent and no solvent 93% and 14% respectively (11).…”
Section: Retreatment Of Bioceramic Sealercontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Using solvent in removing sealers left more residual filling material than rotary instrument alone (10)(11)(12). PUI enhanced remaining material removal in moderately to severely curved root canal efficiently (34,65).…”
Section: Residual Filling Materials With Microct and Confocal Microscopymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations