2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of sampling designs for different fishery groups in the Yangtze River estuary, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performances were evaluated by REE, RB, and CV, which expressed their precision, deviation, and dispersion, respectively. It is well understood that simple random sampling could provide an unbiased mean of the population (Li et al, 2015;Ma et al, 2020). However, a better sampling should pay more attention to not only bias mitigation but also precision improvement (Cochran, 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The performances were evaluated by REE, RB, and CV, which expressed their precision, deviation, and dispersion, respectively. It is well understood that simple random sampling could provide an unbiased mean of the population (Li et al, 2015;Ma et al, 2020). However, a better sampling should pay more attention to not only bias mitigation but also precision improvement (Cochran, 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was expected that stratification should make intra-stratum homogeneity and inter-stratum heterogeneity (Manly et al, 2002;Miller et al, 2007). An appropriate stratification enhanced the ability of SRS to estimate the mean of the population (Ma et al, 2020). When sampling C. mystus eggs, more accuracy was found in Design 3 than in Design 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the survey data from 2004 to 2016, a GAM was used to establish the relationship between the density (tail/haul) of each fishery group and environmental factors for each season (Ma et al. 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic sampling had higher precision and accuracy for estimating population density than SRS and StS in most cases, while StS with proportional allocation scheme showed better estimating performance in some cases (Ma et al. 2020). How do the two sampling designs perform under a continuously higher quantity of survey stations for estimating fishery populaiton density in the YRE?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation