2019
DOI: 10.4103/jlp.jlp_172_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of screening effectiveness of hepatitis B surface antigen and anti-HCV rapid test kits in Pakistan

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The current study was conducted to evaluate the performance and screening effectiveness of commercially available rapid screening kits in comparison with chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Pathology and Blood Transfusion Services, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, PIMS, Islamabad, from January to April 2019. A total of 10 commercially avai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the blood collections in Pakistan are predominantly "family replacement" instead of the WHO recommended regular voluntary donations, 59 the probability of acquiring the infection increases. The rampant use of poor quality RDTs 60 for screening purposes intensifies the situation. Hence, unsafe blood transfusions remained an important driver of the hepatitis epidemic in the country.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the blood collections in Pakistan are predominantly "family replacement" instead of the WHO recommended regular voluntary donations, 59 the probability of acquiring the infection increases. The rampant use of poor quality RDTs 60 for screening purposes intensifies the situation. Hence, unsafe blood transfusions remained an important driver of the hepatitis epidemic in the country.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many blood banks, poor quality, cheap and rapid manual methods are being used for quick screening along with poor laboratory practices. 44 This can lead to a significant probability of missing an infection in the donor population with a multifold increased risk of transmission to transfusion recipients. Rates of voluntary donations are meager accounting for less than 13% of all donations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 The seroprevalence of HBV in blood donors varied from 1.55% to 3.76%, HCV from 2.55% to 7.23%, HIV from 0 0.01% to 0.04% and syphilis varied from 0.59% to 1.16% %. [42][43][44][45][46][47] Our review showed a cumulative frequency of 2.04% (n=16,203) for HBV and 2.44% (n=17,660) for HCV among blood donors. Transmission of HBV and HCV through blood transfusion is a significant concern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 18 ] Earlier studies on the prevalence of HBV in thalassaemia patients report a prevalence of 8.40%[ 19 ] in the Balochistan province, 3.0%[ 20 ] in Islamabad, 5.1%[ 21 ] in Karachi, 5%[ 22 ] in Rawalpindi, and 12.2%[ 23 ] in Bahawalpur. Although screening for HBsAg is mandatory under the Islamabad Blood Safety Ordinance,[ 24 ] the finding of HBsAg in thalassaemia patients indicates poor screening techniques[ 25 ] and low voluntary blood donations. The reporting of HBV infection incident in such patients urges quick response to monitor any uncontrolled transfusion in these patients and demands to maintain quality transfusion services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%