Evaluation of Secure Messaging Applications for a Health Care System: A Case Study

Abstract

Objective The use of text messaging in clinical care has become ubiquitous. Due to security and privacy concerns, many hospital systems are evaluating secure text messaging applications. This paper highlights our evaluation process, and offers an overview of secure messaging functionalities, as well as a framework for how to evaluate such applications. Methods Application functionalities were gathered through literature review, Web sites, speaking with representatives, demonstrations, and use cases. Based on similar levels of functionalities, vendors were grouped into three tiers. Essential and secondary functionalities for our health system were defined to help narrow our vendor choices. Results We stratified 19 secure messaging vendors into three tiers: basic secure communication, secure communication within an existing clinical application, and dedicated communication and collaboration systems. Our essential requirements revolved around functionalities to enhance security and communication, while advanced functionalities were mostly considered secondary. We then narrowed our list of 19 vendors to four, then created clinical use cases to rank the final vendors. Discussion When evaluating a secure messaging application, numerous factors must be considered in parallel. These include: what clinical processes to improve, archiving text messages, mobile device management, bring your own device policy, and Wi-Fi architecture. Conclusion Secure messaging applications provide a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant communication platform, and also include functionality to improve clinical collaboration and workflow. We hope that our evaluation framework can be used by other health systems to find a secure messaging application that meets their needs.

Future Mobile Device Usage, Requirements, and Expectations of Physicians in German University Hospitals: Web-Based Survey

“…A fundamental component of the operationalization of mHealth is the usage of mobile devices, especially smartphones and tablets, by patients or health care professionals. The central areas of utilization of mobile devices in hospitals are (1) oral and written communication [ 11 - 15 ]; (2) documentation, organization, and information [ 16 - 19 ]; (3) decision support, notifications, and alarms [ 20 - 23 ], (4) education and professional training [ 24 - 28 ]; and (5) self-monitoring by physicians [ 29 ]. Taken together, physicians use mobile devices to assure their own decisions in a clinical environment and to increase efficiency in their workplaces [ 30 ].…”

Evaluating the Impact of a New Smartphone Texting Tool on Patient Care in Obstetrics, an Emergent Healthcare Setting

“…To highlight best practices, we can consider lessons learned in the context of a generally recognized framework for healthcare IT implementations as well as lessons learned from prior evaluation studies of multiple secure messaging systems, adoption strategies, and usage. [21][22][23][24][25] The framework introduced by Rippen et al considers technology, users, environment, outcomes, and temporality. 21 On the latter four criteria, this system implementation aligned with suggested standards.…”

“…They highlighted the importance of addressing these types of problems at the beginning in an evaluation study in which essential and secondary requirements are developed and stratified. 22…”

Secure Text Messaging in Healthcare: Latent Threats and Opportunities to Improve Patient Safety

“…At the core of these proposals lies an important tension: can implementation of STMS occur in isolation or should the arrival of these systems prompt an overhaul of an institution's clinical communication system and culture? 15…”