2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of semi-static enclosure technique for rapid surveys of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) emission measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other factors, such as genetic and geographic differences, leaf age, plant age, growth stage, physiological status of plants, seasonality, soil moisture and nutrient status, shading and microclimate, can also result in variations in emission rates (Harley et al, 1997;Loreto et al, 2009;Singh et al, 2011;Welter et al, 2012;Llusià et al, 2013). Moreover, the inconsistent measurement enclosure systems used in different studies may be an important factor that introduces substantial uncertainty for E s Niinemets et al, 2011;Li et al, 2019). Overall, the E s of isoprene from all the measured tree species measured by dynamic chambers are higher than those from static chambers except for A. auriculaeformis and F. macrocarpa (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other factors, such as genetic and geographic differences, leaf age, plant age, growth stage, physiological status of plants, seasonality, soil moisture and nutrient status, shading and microclimate, can also result in variations in emission rates (Harley et al, 1997;Loreto et al, 2009;Singh et al, 2011;Welter et al, 2012;Llusià et al, 2013). Moreover, the inconsistent measurement enclosure systems used in different studies may be an important factor that introduces substantial uncertainty for E s Niinemets et al, 2011;Li et al, 2019). Overall, the E s of isoprene from all the measured tree species measured by dynamic chambers are higher than those from static chambers except for A. auriculaeformis and F. macrocarpa (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported emission rates for isoprene and total MTs varied by up to several orders of magnitude. The reliability of static enclosure measurements is questionable in comparison with dynamic enclosure measurements (Niinemets et al, 2011;Li et al, 2019;Zeng et al, 2022). The laboratory control measurements for seedlings (Tsui et al, 2009;Leung et al, 2010), however, may not well-represent real-world emissions from mature trees under natural growing environments (Niinemets et al, 2011;Emmerson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These will change the physiological state of plants and cause abnormal emissions . For this reason, static or semi-static enclosures are considered to be screening tools to verify emitters and non-emitters (Niinemets et al, 2011;Li et al, 2019). Unlike static enclosure, dynamic enclosure introduces circulating air and can reduce the differences in environmental parameters between the enclosure and the ambient to a great extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, static or semi-static enclosures are considered to be screening tools to verify emitters and non-emitters (Niinemets et al, 2011;Li et al, 2019). Unlike static enclosure, dynamic enclosure introduces circulating air and can reduce the differences in environmental parameters between the enclosure and the ambient to a great extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%