2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2009.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of solid sorbents as a retrofit technology for CO2 capture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
156
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
156
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above discussed diffusion and mass transfer limitations make this percentage to fall down to approximately 25% for the activated carbon GCL, what would imply the necessity of increasing the bed length (or the bed weight) to achieve a better use of the adsorbent. The comparison of these values to others reported in the literature shows that the capacity value obtained in column experiments for the activated carbon fiber, FCL, is considerably higher than those reported by Jadhav et al (2007) with modified zeolites 13X; and Sjostrom and Krutka (2010) with different carbon materials at very similar experimental conditions. Regeneration capacity, defined as the capacity of a specific material to be used in subsequent adsorption-desorption cycles, is another key issue that can be addressed by dynamic fix bed studies.…”
Section: Breakthrough Experimentssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The above discussed diffusion and mass transfer limitations make this percentage to fall down to approximately 25% for the activated carbon GCL, what would imply the necessity of increasing the bed length (or the bed weight) to achieve a better use of the adsorbent. The comparison of these values to others reported in the literature shows that the capacity value obtained in column experiments for the activated carbon fiber, FCL, is considerably higher than those reported by Jadhav et al (2007) with modified zeolites 13X; and Sjostrom and Krutka (2010) with different carbon materials at very similar experimental conditions. Regeneration capacity, defined as the capacity of a specific material to be used in subsequent adsorption-desorption cycles, is another key issue that can be addressed by dynamic fix bed studies.…”
Section: Breakthrough Experimentssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…silica's, polymers, zeolites) with amine functional groups immobilized on or grafted to its surface (Ebner et al, 2011). The key strengths of this type of sorbents material include high CO 2 capacities (Veneman et al, 2012), fast CO 2 uptake rates, a low heat of adsorption (63.2 kJ mol −1 (Gray et al, 2009)) and relatively mild regeneration conditions (373-423 K) compared to other chemical sorbents (Sjostrom and Krutka, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide variety of solid sorbents is currently under study to separate CO 2 from energy-generating coal-fired power plants such as zeolites, activated carbons, calcium oxides, hydrotalcites, supported amines and metal-organic framework (MOF) materials [3,[5][6][7][8][9][10]. Physisorbents such as activated carbons (AC) and aluminosilicate zeolite molecular sieves show considerable promise for CO 2 adsorption because of their good adsorption capacities, rapid adsorption kinetics and low regeneration energies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at higher pressures, the CO 2 uptake of AC can surpass that of zeolites [3,11]. Additionally, AC have a hydrophobic character [6] and can be produced from a wide variety of sources (coal, industrial byproducts, biomass sources, etc. ), which makes them cheaper to produce on an industrial scale than other sorbents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%