2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2017.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of stainless steel surgical instruments subjected to multiple use/processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A handful of studies evaluating reprocessed SUDs have illustrated the retention of biological soils despite cleaning procedures. In a study that examined surgical scissors, forceps, rasps, and drill bits, complex device features were found to harbor protein, and biofilm encapsulated bacteria [ 23 ]. Stainless steel surgical instruments intended for multiple use have also proven to harbor organic material despite reprocessing procedures [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A handful of studies evaluating reprocessed SUDs have illustrated the retention of biological soils despite cleaning procedures. In a study that examined surgical scissors, forceps, rasps, and drill bits, complex device features were found to harbor protein, and biofilm encapsulated bacteria [ 23 ]. Stainless steel surgical instruments intended for multiple use have also proven to harbor organic material despite reprocessing procedures [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was evidence of a hydrophobic surface based on beading of the water-based Luminol solution. We hypothesize that the heat generated during device use and the reprocessing process may have bonded the biological material to the plastic jaw, which is supported by studies evaluating a series of stainless steel surgical instruments that had undergone several sterilization cycles [ 23 , 24 ]. Future work is needed to confirm bonding and effectively solubilize film samples to enable identification and quantification of the remnant material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of the surgical instrument can act by making it difficult to remove dirt during the cleaning stage (24) . In health products containing joints, serrations, lumen or with irregular surface processed several times during their useful life, analyzed after sterilization, the presence of proteins was verified in levels up to 100 times higher than recommended, besides the presence of biofilms (25) . Therefore, in addition to accumulating a greater bacterial load, these areas present an even greater challenge to their removal during processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This phenomenon has demonstrated to be effective at removing contamination from hands 37 , skin 38 , proteins from stainless steel and tissue from bone grafts 39 , dental biofilms 39 , 40 , marine biofouling 41 and contaiminant from railtracks 42 . Bjerknes forces 43 aid the scrubbing bubbles in efficiently removing contaminants from microscopic crevices, such as those found on worn surgical instruments 44 , that are traditionally difficult to clean by brushes, wiping, or by chemical means that rely on passive diffusion for reagents to penetrate deep into the crevice 45 . The efficient removal of contamination from crevices using a UAS system has been demonstrated previously 40 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%