2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2013.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of stereo correspondence algorithms and their implementation on FPGA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An explicit comparison with other state-of-theart FPGA-based stereo-vision architecture has not been made since they focus on block-based methods [28][29][30][31]. Even if they provide more dense results, due to their increased complexity, they incur in a greater hardware resources consumption (not including the resources needed for the image pre-processing) [28,52,53].…”
Section: Fpga Subsystem Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…An explicit comparison with other state-of-theart FPGA-based stereo-vision architecture has not been made since they focus on block-based methods [28][29][30][31]. Even if they provide more dense results, due to their increased complexity, they incur in a greater hardware resources consumption (not including the resources needed for the image pre-processing) [28,52,53].…”
Section: Fpga Subsystem Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if they provide more dense results, due to their increased complexity, they incur in a greater hardware resources consumption (not including the resources needed for the image pre-processing) [28,52,53].…”
Section: Fpga Subsystem Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To mitigate this issue, investigations have been made to implement dedicated hardware architectures of more precise algorithms, such as Semi Global Matching (SGM) [8], [9] and Adaptive Support Weight (ADSW) [10], [11]. For the past few years, hardware implementations predicated on SGM and ADSW algorithms have become the preferred solution towards higher matching precision in embedded vision applications [5], [7], [12], [13]. In addition, modifications and improvements have been made to implementations to habituate the algorithms for real-time processing, with improvement in execution times over existing designs [14] but at the cost of increased error rates when compared to state-of-the-art software implementations [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%