2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of structural aspects and operation environments on the performance of passive micro direct methanol fuel cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these conditions (environmental temperature and atmospheric pressure, as well as cell orientation and environmental conditions) can be considered external to the system, as explained in a recent comprehensive study reported by Wang et al [116], who investigated their effect on the performance of a PS-DMFC. In contrast, they considered internal/structural factors to include the hot press parameters of the MEA (temperature, pressure, and time), flow channel patterns (horizontal stripe pattern (HSP), vertical strip pattern (VSP), and circle pattern (CP)), and CC open ratios (35.8%, 45.6%, and 52%).…”
Section: Acidic Dmfcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these conditions (environmental temperature and atmospheric pressure, as well as cell orientation and environmental conditions) can be considered external to the system, as explained in a recent comprehensive study reported by Wang et al [116], who investigated their effect on the performance of a PS-DMFC. In contrast, they considered internal/structural factors to include the hot press parameters of the MEA (temperature, pressure, and time), flow channel patterns (horizontal stripe pattern (HSP), vertical strip pattern (VSP), and circle pattern (CP)), and CC open ratios (35.8%, 45.6%, and 52%).…”
Section: Acidic Dmfcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Micro Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (μDMFC), as a novel clean energy source, has compelling prospects for application in portable electronics energy due to its high energy density, easy storage and abundant sources of fuel, easy start-up, and eco-friendly. 1–5 A conventional μDMFC mainly consists of the current collector, diffusion layer, microporous layer, catalytic layer, and proton exchange membrane, among which the diffusion layer and current collector play essential roles in the electron and mass transport of the cell. 6–9 When using a conventional perforated stainless steel current collector to provide encapsulation pressure, there is a large contact impedance and uneven pressure distribution between the diffusion layer and the current collector, as well as a large mass transfer dead zone, which leads to μDMFC performance degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the passive DMFC with a combination of perforated collector plates under an opening ratio of 55.40% and stainless-steel mesh collector plates under an opening ratio of 38.70% achieves the best performance by producing peak power density at a methanol concentration of 5 mol/L. Wang et al [22] investigated the effects of current collector channel patterns and a current collector open ratio on the performance of µDMFC through experiments. The experimental results showed that the µDMFC with an open ratio of 45.6% or 35.8% has optimal performance under natural convection conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%