2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of suitable target antigens and immunoassays for high-accuracy immune monitoring of cytomegalovirus and Epstein–Barr virus-specific T cells as targets of interest in immunotherapeutic approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study used FluoroSpot assays to measure IFN-␥ production by CD4 ϩ T cells; FluoroSpot is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay which enables measurement of multiple cytokines simultaneously (59). Experience from our own studies and other groups suggests that the ELISPOT assay is more sensitive than other methods for detecting T cell responses to HCMV antigens (60), so the contrasting observations obtained in this study compared to those obtained in previously published work are not explained by the use of different techniques to measure IFN-␥ responses. The studies demonstrating an increased frequency of CMV-specific CD4 ϩ T cells in older donors (19,21,22) did not investigate the absolute size of the T cell compartment in peripheral blood.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…The current study used FluoroSpot assays to measure IFN-␥ production by CD4 ϩ T cells; FluoroSpot is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay which enables measurement of multiple cytokines simultaneously (59). Experience from our own studies and other groups suggests that the ELISPOT assay is more sensitive than other methods for detecting T cell responses to HCMV antigens (60), so the contrasting observations obtained in this study compared to those obtained in previously published work are not explained by the use of different techniques to measure IFN-␥ responses. The studies demonstrating an increased frequency of CMV-specific CD4 ϩ T cells in older donors (19,21,22) did not investigate the absolute size of the T cell compartment in peripheral blood.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…ELISpot represents the most sensitive read-out system and thus is most appropriate for the detection of low-level responses [23, 24]. In particular, ELISpot is more sensitive than ICS for the detection of antigen-specific cells, such as in vitro-reactivated memory T cells, which produce only low amounts of cytokines [15, 25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional CMV-specific ELISpot assays are based on the detection of IFN-γ-producing CD4 + and/or CD8 + T cells, depending on the antigens used for PBMC stimulation [23, 24, 29, 30]. The careful selection and formulation of antigens is crucial to ensure specificity, sensitivity and thus a diagnostic value to the assay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent technical advancements of multimers facilitate detection of low affinity T cells due to higher binding avidity to surface TCR [70,71] and allow reversible pMHClabeling of antigen-specific T cells without affecting T-cell function [72,73]. Multimer staining achieves high sensitivity comparable to ELISPOT [74]. The major limitation is that requires knowledge of the patient's HLA-type and the relevant peptide antigens.…”
Section: Pmhc Multimer Stainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EBVspecific T-cell responses can be quantified by ELISPOT [101][102][103][104], ICS [105,106] and pMHC multimer staining [101,107] or by combining pMHC multimer staining and ICS techniques [106] in SOT recipients. A recent study compared five immunoassays [the functional EBV-specific IFN-␥ ELISPOT, ICS, ELISA and cytokine secretion assays (CSA) and the detection of EBV-specific T cells by pMHC multimer staining] in healthy subjects and identified the peptidebased IFN-␥ ELISPOT as the most accurate technique for immune monitoring and CSA for a more detailed phenotypic and functional analysis of T cells [74]. EBV-specific CD8 + T-cell responses have been studied in detail showing that epitopes from the EBNA3 family of proteins induce the strongest response [108].…”
Section: Ebvmentioning
confidence: 99%