2003
DOI: 10.1021/la026705r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Surface−Protein Binding Constants by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…K is then calculated to be ∼7 × 10 6 M −1 . This binding constant between electrospun PCL membrane and HSA-FITC is consistent with other binding constants of proteins on hydrophobic surfaces . This confirms that electrospun PCL membranes surface are suitable for antibody immobilization via direct hydrophobic adsorption.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…K is then calculated to be ∼7 × 10 6 M −1 . This binding constant between electrospun PCL membrane and HSA-FITC is consistent with other binding constants of proteins on hydrophobic surfaces . This confirms that electrospun PCL membranes surface are suitable for antibody immobilization via direct hydrophobic adsorption.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As mentioned above, surface MALDI-TOF measurements are difficult to quantify, and the method itself is semiquantitative. In a series of publications by the group of Kinsel, the problems to quantify this method have been discussed. This is very difficult especially for a very little amount of adsorbed protein. However, the detection limits of the method are competitive, and surface MALDI-TOF methods are recently becoming more and more important …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the number of desorbed ions that do form by energetic desorption methods often fluctuates dramatically due to the competition of different ionization mechanisms and their dependencies upon diverse surface properties. For example, the MALDI signal for a given species is generally found to be inversely proportional to its surface binding strength, inhibiting detection of covalently and other strongly bound species. , Such fluctuations in ion yields complicate identification and quantification of organic surface species, limiting the applicability of these techniques to surface analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%