1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1997.tb01697.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Surgical Scrub Methods for Large Animal Surgeons

Abstract: Surgeons may use either chlorhexidine or povidone iodine for antiseptic preparation of their hands before surgery. A two-brush technique is not necessary.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is has been accepted for decades that everyone involved in direct contact with the surgical field or sterile items should perform a surgical scrub and don sterile gloves. Surgical scrub techniques have been evaluated extensively elsewhere (38,39). Recently, application of alcohol-chlorhexidine combinations have been evaluated as a replacement for surgical scrubbing and have been shown to be more effective than standard surgical scrub methods (40,41).…”
Section: Infection Prevention and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is has been accepted for decades that everyone involved in direct contact with the surgical field or sterile items should perform a surgical scrub and don sterile gloves. Surgical scrub techniques have been evaluated extensively elsewhere (38,39). Recently, application of alcohol-chlorhexidine combinations have been evaluated as a replacement for surgical scrubbing and have been shown to be more effective than standard surgical scrub methods (40,41).…”
Section: Infection Prevention and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial sampling was performed using the "glove juice" method (Wan et al 1997;Rotter et al 2009). Sterile surgical gloves were placed on the hands using the open glove method.…”
Section: Bacterial Sampling and Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors' reply : Thank you for your comments and concerns regarding our recent publication. The use of a neutralizing agent in sampling fluids has recently become emphasized in study design; however, historically, studies in veterinary medicine have been performed without the use of neutralizing agents . At the time of our study design, the FDA standard did not provide clear guidelines regarding the use of neutralizing agents and recommended only that neutralization status be clearly reported .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore crucial to neutralize the active agent during the culture period 2,3 to avoid overestimation of efficacy by 0.3-1.1 log 10steps. 4 The authors discuss this as a controversial point in current testing standards and state that the FDA does not provide clear guidelines or request neutralization agents; however, the use of neutralizing agents has been the standard for the European Standardization Norm on testing of presurgical hand asepsis products for over a decade. 5 In May 2015, the FDA clearly requires the use of an appropriate neutralizer in all recovery media in order not to obtain false positive efficacy results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%