2019
DOI: 10.1002/esp.4758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Terrestrial Laser Scanner and Structure from Motion photogrammetry techniques for quantifying soil surface roughness parameters over agricultural soils

Abstract: The surface roughness of agricultural soils is mainly related to the type of tillage performed, typically consisting of oriented and random components. Traditionally, soil surface roughness (SSR) characterization has been difficult due to its high spatial variability and the sensitivity of roughness parameters to the characteristics of the instruments, including its measurement scale. Recent advances in surveying have greatly improved the spatial resolution, extent, and availability of surface elevation datase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The root mean square (RMS) of height deviations of the snow depth is calculated from the three dimensional plane fitted to the UAV-derived snow depth using the methodology detailed in Martinez-Agirre et al (2020). An additional measure of the two-dimensional local variability (n−) is provided through the calculation of variograms constructed using the Scikit GStat library Variography (Mälicke and Schneider, 2021) using 15,000 randomly sampled points from the UAV-derived acquisitions for the west and east portions of the lake.…”
Section: Spatial Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The root mean square (RMS) of height deviations of the snow depth is calculated from the three dimensional plane fitted to the UAV-derived snow depth using the methodology detailed in Martinez-Agirre et al (2020). An additional measure of the two-dimensional local variability (n−) is provided through the calculation of variograms constructed using the Scikit GStat library Variography (Mälicke and Schneider, 2021) using 15,000 randomly sampled points from the UAV-derived acquisitions for the west and east portions of the lake.…”
Section: Spatial Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we reviewed the uncertainties of certain input data (e.g., DEM, SOC, and soil texture), measures for other complex input‐data (e.g., BD, erosional resistance, and hydraulic surface roughness) are still missing. The gap could be filled by utilizing geostatistical or machine learning approaches (e.g., Emadi et al, 2020; McBratney et al, 2003), or new measuring techniques using remote‐sensing data (Martinez‐Agirre et al, 2020). At the same time, data and scripts of such studies should be freely accessible in spirit of reproducibility, to facilitate exchange and progress in modelling (Kuhwald et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, a rapid and low-cost solution is the structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry technique paired with multi-stereo view (MSV) algorithms (hereafter SfM). This has been used in different studies in agriculture: to analyse microtopography on surfaces managed with conservation agricultural management (Tarolli et al, 2019); to monitor the bank erosion in drainage network (Prosdocimi et al, 2015); to measure the surface roughness of cultivated terrain surfaces (Martinez-Agirre et al, 2020;Snapir et al, 2014); and to estimate soil loss by erosion (Vinci et al, 2017). SfM may be used through different acquisition platforms that permit analysis at different spatial levels, from plot to field scale (Dong et al, 2017;Jay et al, 2015;Nguyen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%