1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01591362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the anthraxin skin test for diagnosis of acute and past human anthrax

Abstract: A skin test for the diagnosis of human anthrax was evaluated as an alternative to bacteriological confirmation of human anthrax, which is possible in 10-40% of cases within the first three weeks of the disease only. The anthraxin skin test, which detects anthrax cell-mediated immunity, was positive in 81.8% of cases in the first three days of the disease, and in 97-99% of cases in the next two to three weeks. The positivity rate was 98.5% in the first 1.5 months of convalescence, 92.8% in the next 3 years, 82.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical diagnosis of cutaneous anthrax is traditionally established by microbiological methods like demonstrating Gram-positive, capsulated bacilli on the smear of the lesion or isolating B. anthracis in culture (2,24). However, Gram staining and culture for B. anthracis can be unrevealing for patients who have received antibiotic therapy before the collection of samples (23). Moreover, cutaneous anthrax lesions are very difficult to discriminate from many other skin infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical diagnosis of cutaneous anthrax is traditionally established by microbiological methods like demonstrating Gram-positive, capsulated bacilli on the smear of the lesion or isolating B. anthracis in culture (2,24). However, Gram staining and culture for B. anthracis can be unrevealing for patients who have received antibiotic therapy before the collection of samples (23). Moreover, cutaneous anthrax lesions are very difficult to discriminate from many other skin infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34,35 However, gram stain and culture for B. anthracis can be unrevealing for patients who receive antibiotic therapy before specimens are obtained. 36,37 Historically, skin biopsies of cutaneous anthrax lesions have seldom been performed, and the histopathological features have been described in only a few untreated human cases and in experimental animals. 38 -41 In this report, we describe the histopathological features and the immunohistochemical (IHC) findings of bioterrorism-related cutaneous anthrax cases of 2001, and compare the results of IHC assays with other laboratory diagnostic methods, including culture, special stains, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and serology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a patient has a typical malignant pustule or malignant edema and has had a history of contact with animals, the diagnosis may be easy. The clinical laboratory diagnosis of cutaneous anthrax is generally established by conventional microbiological methods, such as bacterial cultures and directly gram staining smears of clinical specimens [15]. However, the clinical presentation could be atypical and the patient’s recollection of contact with animals may not be accurate, or the patient may neglect to supply this information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%